Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: CELL-O-CORE COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CELL-O-CORE COMPANY in 6935 RIDGE RD., SHARON CENTER, OH 44274 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 343354643.

Watch Cell-O-Core Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cell-O-Core Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CELL-O-CORE COMPANY
Site address
6935 RIDGE RD.
City
SHARON CENTER
State
OH
ZIP
44274
Mailing
6935 RIDGE RD., SHARON CENTER, OH 44274
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
150
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8315.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(2)(ii): If an energy isolating device is capable of being locked out, the employer's energy control program under paragraph (c)(1) of this section shall utilize lockout, unless the employer can demonstrate that the utilization of a tagout system will provide full employee protection as set forth in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.  On or about August 1, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that an employee who was servicing Line #11 for a faulty electrical contact on the extruder machine, utilized lock out tag out to protect the servicing employee from hazards such as but not limited to arc flash and electrical shock.  Employees are exposed to both pneumatic and electrical energy sources.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8315

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8315.00 · Current $6237.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    On or about August 1, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that machine specific procedures for the control of hazardous energy (pneumatic and electrical) were developed and implemented for the various machines in the facility, to include but not limited to an extrusion machine (Line #11).   Employees are exposed to hazards such as but not limited to arc flash and electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6237
  • — Z (S) $8315

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8315.00 · Current $8315.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    On or about August 1, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that a periodic inspection was performed of their written lock out tag out program at least annually.  The program was written and implemented as part of their employee handbook in 2016.  The program has deficiencies such as but not limited not having machine specific procedures in place.  Employees are exposed to pneumatic and electrical energy sources and hazards such as but not limited to arc flash and electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8315
  • — Z (S) $8315

1910.333 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8315.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): While an employee was exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which were deenergized, the circuits energizing the parts were not locked out or tagged or both in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph (b) of 29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2):  On or about August 1, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that an employee who was working on the electrical components of Line #11 had applied lock out tag out prior to performing the work.  The electrical energy was not fully isolated prior to performing the work and an employee sustained 2nd and 3rd degree burns to his hands due to an arc flash fire.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8315

1910.335 A01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8315.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:  On or about August 1, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that employees who work with or around electricity are provided with the appropriate personal protective equipment to protect them from hazards such as but not limited to electrical shock and burns.  An employee who was working on the electrical components of Line #11 had applied lock out tag out prior to performing the work, however, the electrical energy was not fully isolated prior to performing the work.  The employee also did not have on any FR rated (fire resistant) personal protective equipment.  An arc flash fire occurred and the employee sustained 2nd and 3rd degree burns to his hands.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8315

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343354643.