Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: WILFREDO GUTIERREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WILFREDO GUTIERREZ in CORNER OF 114TH AVE & MERCURY ST., PAPILLION, NE 68133 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343355202.

Watch Wilfredo Gutierrez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wilfredo Gutierrez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
WILFREDO GUTIERREZ
Site address
CORNER OF 114TH AVE & MERCURY ST.
City
PAPILLION
State
NE
ZIP
68133
Mailing
3502 DREXEL ST., OMAHA, NE 68107
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19

Deleted Other-than-serious 6 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):   The employer did not certify to OSHA Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that each cited violation has been abated:  (a) The employer failed to certify that Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 12/20/2018 with an abatement date of 01/10/2019 had been abated.  (b) The employer failed to certify that Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 12/20/2018 with an abatement date of 01/10/2019 had been abated.    (c) The employer failed to certify that Citation 1, Item 3, issued on 12/20/2018 with an abatement date of 01/10/2019 had been abated.  (d) The employer failed to certify that Citation 1, Item 4, issued on 12/20/2018 with an abatement date of 01/10/2019 had been abated.  (e) The employer failed to certify that Citation 1, Item 5, issued on 12/20/2018 with an abatement date of 01/10/2019 had been abated.  (f) The employer failed to certify that Citation 1, Item 6, issued on 12/20/2018 with an abatement date of 01/10/2019 had been abated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts shall not be used to support scaffold platforms unless the entire platform is attached to the fork and the fork-lift is not moved horizontally while the platform is occupied.  The employer is failing to ensure that all employees are protected from fall hazards when using fork-lifts with scaffold platforms that are not securely attached to the fork, preventing it from moving horizontally while the platform is occupied. This was most recently observed on July 31, 2018 at the jobsite located at the corner of 114th Street and Mercury Street Papillion, NE 68133. An employee was installing fascia on a two-story residential structure and utilizing a mobile scaffold with a platform inappropriately attached to the arm of the forklift.  The employee was exposed to falls of over 18 feet to the ground level below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level. The fall protection requirements for employees installing suspension scaffold support systems on floors, roofs, and other elevated surfaces are set forth in subpart M of this part.  The employer is failing to ensure that all employees are protected from fall hazards while working from elevated platform. This was most recently observed on July 31, 2018 at the jobsite located at the corner of 114th Street and Mercury Street Papillion, NE 68133.  An employee was working on installing fascia on a new two-story residential structure. To accomplish this work activity, the employee was using a mobile scaffold with no fall protection system.  The employee was exposed to falls of Approximately 18 feet to the ground level below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, or personal fall arrest systems:     The employer is failing to ensure employees are protected from fall hazards while installing trusses on a residential house.  A worker was observed walking on the top plate of the wall of the residential style construction site (house) without utilizing fall protection.  This was most recently observed on July 31, 2018 at the jobsite located at the corner of 114th Street and Mercury Street Papillion, NE 68133.  The workers were exposed to falls of over 24 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:      The employer is failing to provide employees with adequate and effective fall protection training prior to installing trusses on a building.  A worker was observed walking on the top plate of the wall of the residential style construction site (house) without utilizing fall protection.  This was most recently observed on July 31, 2018 at the jobsite located at the corner of 114th Street and Mercury Street Papillion, NE 68133.  This training would allow each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and allow them to understand the proper procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.   The workers were exposed to falls of over 24 feet to dirt and concrete below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:     The employer is failing to ensure employees are protected from fall hazards while utilizing portable ladders as part of truss installation operations.  Workers were utilizing the top step of the 12 foot ladder to access the top plate of the wall unit on site.  The workers were exposed to falls of over 9 feet to dirt and concrete below.  This was most recently observed on July 31, 2018 at the jobsite located at the corner of 114th Street and Mercury Street Papillion, NE 68133 when the employer had employees walking on the top plate of the house being built on site.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  The employer is failing to provide employees with adequate and effective ladder safety training prior to allowing them to work on a residential house.    The top step of of the ladder on site was being used as a step to access the top plate of a wall.  This was most recently observed on July 31, 2018 at the jobsite located at the corner of 114th Street and Mercury Street Papillion, NE 68133.  The workers were exposed to falls of over 24 feet to the ground below.  Had the employees had this training the above listed instances would not have been present on the job site.  This training would allow each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and allow them to understand the proper procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2772

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343355202.