Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: K SOUSA QUALITY CONS CO., INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of K SOUSA QUALITY CONS CO., INC. in 645 WOONASQUATUCKET AVE., NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI 02911 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343385415.

Watch K Sousa Quality Cons CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for K Sousa Quality Cons CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
645 WOONASQUATUCKET AVE.
City
NORTH PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02911
Mailing
29 BUTTONWOOD ST., BRISTOL, RI 02809
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $9000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    (a) On the northwest side of the residence:  On or about 8/15/2018, employees stripping the roof on a 12-12 pitch roof did not have a means of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9000
  • — Z (S) $12934

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    (a) On the northwest side of the roof:  On or about 8/15/2018, employees were not trained in fall protection, preventing the employees from recognizing the hazard of being exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 14'6".
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12934

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    (a) On the north side of the residence:  On or about 8/15/2018, a portable extension ladder was used to access the roof, and did not have the ladder rails extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1053 B16

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired:    (a) On the north side of the residence:  On or about 8/15/2018, a portable extension ladder was being used that had side rails that were bent and/or distorted in multiple areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:    (a) On the northwest side of the residence:  On or about 8/15/2018, the employer did not train employees using ladders, in that, the ladder being used had bent and distorted ladder rails and did not have the side rails extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343385415.