Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DYNAMIC DRINKWARE LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DYNAMIC DRINKWARE LLC in 3555 MOSER ST, OSHKOSH, WI 54901 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 343419826.

Watch Dynamic Drinkware LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dynamic Drinkware LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3555 MOSER ST
City
OSHKOSH
State
WI
ZIP
54901
Mailing
3555 MOSER ST, OSHKOSH, WI 54901
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5497.00 · Current $3298.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(c): 29 CFR 1910.22(c): The employer did not ensure that each employee used a safe means of access and egress to and from walking-working surfaces:    On or about 8/18/2018, Employee helping guide mold into place for Line "E" was standing on a platen approximately 82" above the cement floor without any fall protection. Access to the platen area was by climbing on the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3298.2
  • — Z (S) $5497

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following:  Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or about 8/18/2018, Employee helping guide mold into place for Line "E" was standing on a platen approximately 82" above the cement floor without any fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4398.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a)    On or about 8/27/2018, Perimeter guarding for line "A" STORK machine had an opening approximately 42" wide  x 21" high on the east side of the machine and an opening approximately 25" wide x 30" high on the west side of the machine which would allow employee access.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $4398

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4398.00 · Current $2639.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    a)    On or about 8/27/2018, A MASTER FORCE bench grinder was available for use without the proper tongue guard adjustment. The opening between the wheel and the guard was approximately 1 3/4".
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2638.8
  • — Z (S) $4398

1904.7 B04

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1100.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(4): The employer did not correctly classify the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent.   On or about August 18, 2018, the employer had an employee fall and injure their elbow (Case No. 2).  As a result of the injury, the employee was written restrictions, and the employer did not indicate as such on the 2018 OSHA Form 300 Log.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1100

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $617.00 · Current $617.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  a)    On or about 8/27/2018, the employer had not been completing periodic inspection annually of their energy control program as outlined in the OSHA standard and the companies own Lockout/Tagout program issued 5/28/2010.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $617
  • — Z (O) $617

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343419826.