Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DUSTIN ST. PIERRE

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DUSTIN ST. PIERRE in 608 WOOD AVENUE, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343435855.

Watch Dustin ST. Pierre — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dustin ST. Pierre is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DUSTIN ST. PIERRE
Site address
608 WOOD AVENUE
City
WOONSOCKET
State
RI
ZIP
02895
Mailing
145 WELLS STREET, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $1940.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 8/31/2018, eye and face protective equipment was not used when an employee was using a pneumatic nail gun.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1940
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $2716.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):     (a) Worksite:  On or about 8/31/2018, employees were not protected from falling while working on a roof approximately twenty-one feet above a lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not  independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 8/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that he and his employee had separate anchorage points to support them as part of a fall arrest system. Further, the employer only used four fasteners instead of the required six to install the hinged roof anchor being used as part of the fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 8/31/2018, the employer did not certify in writing that each employee was trained in fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343435855.