Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DOC'S VISION CONTRACTING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DOC'S VISION CONTRACTING, LLC in 10475 ELDERBERRY ROAD, PLAIN CITY, OH 43064 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 343502837.

Watch Doc'S Vision Contracting, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Doc'S Vision Contracting, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10475 ELDERBERRY ROAD
City
PLAIN CITY
State
OH
ZIP
43064
Mailing
P.O. BOX 442, GROVE CITY, OH 43123
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.     a. On or about October 1, 2018, at the Epcon Communities residential site, Lot 1, in Jerome Village, the employer failed to maintain a safety and health program, including fall protection, to ensure hazard detection and correction.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2772
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.   Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.     a. On or about October 1, 2018, at the Epcon Communities residential site, Lot 1, in Jerome Village, an employee installing a fireplace venting system on the roof was not protected by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, thereby exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet, 5.5 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2772

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343502837.