Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SHIGLA CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SHIGLA CONSTRUCTION LLC in 860 S PORTER STREET, MANCHESTER, NH 03103 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 343550356.

Watch Shigla Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Shigla Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
860 S PORTER STREET
City
MANCHESTER
State
NH
ZIP
03103
Mailing
174 GROVE STREET, NEW BRITAIN, CT 06053
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $311.00 · Current $311.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  a.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1a, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.  b.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1b, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.  c.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1c, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.  d.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2a, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.  e.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 2 Item 2b, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.  f.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2c nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.  f.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2d nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.  g. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.  h. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.  i. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 2 Item 1 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.  j. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 2 Item 2 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 6, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $311

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- Employees were not protected from fall and electrocution hazards where the employer did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to be conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  Site- An employee working from a tubular welded frame scaffold was not protected from fall and scaffold collapse hazards where the employer did not provide for a competent person to inspect the scaffolding at the site.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:  Site- An employee working from a tubular welded frame scaffold was not protected from fall and scaffold collapse hazards where the employer did not provide for a competent person to erect the scaffolding at the site.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)  Site- An employee working from a tubular welded frame scaffold was not protected from a fall hazard where the work platform was not fully planked between the uprights.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(i): The end of a platform 10 feet or less in length, extended over its support more than 12 inches:Note:  Does not apply if the platform was designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform was able to support employees and/or materials without tipping or had guardrails that blocked employee access to the end.  Site- An employee working from a tubular welded frame scaffold was not protected from fall and scaffold collapse hazards where the employer did not ensure that the platform extended over its support an adequate distance.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  Site- An employee working from a tubular welded frame scaffold was not protected from fall and scaffold collapse hazards where the scaffold frame legs did not bear on base plates and mud sills.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally:  Site- An employee working from a tubular welded frame scaffold was not protected from a fall hazard where cross braces were not installed at all connection points to maintain stability.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:  Site- An employee working from a JLG 600S aerial lift was not protected from a fall hazard where they were not using fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  Site- Employees operating and working from a JLG 600S and a JLG 400S aerial lift were not provided with operator and fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.404 B01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): General. The employer shall use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors.   Site- Employees were not utilizing ground fault circuit interrupters as required by the standard for use of the double insulated drill.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.404 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures shall be permanent and continuous.   Site- Employees were not utilizing an extension cord which had a grounding pin for use of the double insulated drill.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343550356.