OSHA Inspection: JD CONSTRUCTION AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Issued

2019-05-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-07-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $5304.00 · Current $3182.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     On or about 12/14/2018, at 121 3rd Avenue North, Naples, Florida, employees working on top of a tie beam did not have fall protection exposing them to fall hazards of approximately 15 feet to ground level.

Issued

2019-05-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-07-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4546.00 · Current $2728.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    On or about 12/14/2018, at 121 3rd Avenue North, Naples, Florida, the employer failed to instruct employees on fall prevention exposing them to fall hazards.

Issued

2019-05-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-07-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $5304.00 · Current $3182.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:      On or about 12/14/2018, at 121 3rd Avenue North, Naples, Florida, the employer failed to provide rebar caps on exposed rebar below and along the east side of the tie beam of a residential structure in construction, thus exposing employees to an impalement hazard.

Issued

2019-05-29 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-07-31 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3031.00 · Current $1819.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:      On or about 12/14/2018, at 121 3rd Avenue North, Naples, Florida, employees were using an extension ladder that did not extend at least 3-feet above the landing surface and secured from being displaced, thus exposing workers to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet to ground level.