Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JESUS LOZDA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JESUS LOZDA in EDGEWOOD ACRES THIRD ADDITION LOT 81, GRAND CHUTE, WI 54913 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343592069.

Watch Jesus Lozda — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jesus Lozda is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JESUS LOZDA
Site address
EDGEWOOD ACRES THIRD ADDITION LOT 81
City
GRAND CHUTE
State
WI
ZIP
54913
Mailing
977 APPLETON RD, MENASHA, WI 54952
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1063.00 · Current $1063.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):   The employer failed to certify to OSHA (the Agency) that the following item(s) were abated within 10 calendar days after the abatement date:  Jesus Lozda, did not provide abatement certification within 10 calendar days after the abatement date on all the cited items.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $1063

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2827.00 · Current $2827.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a.  On or about November 08, 2018, an employee engaged in roofing activities on a single-family residence, with unprotected sides and edges greater than six feet above the ground at the jobsite located at Edgewood Acres Third Addition Lot No. 81 Grand Chute, WI was not protected from falling by an acceptable form of fall protection.  An employee engaged in roofing activities was exposed to falls of approximately 9 feet when a personal fall arrest system was not used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2827

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343592069.