Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MARTIN'S BULK MILK SERVICE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MARTIN'S BULK MILK SERVICE, INC. in 1101 WATER STREET, WILTON, WI 54670 (NAICS 484230). OSHA activity number 343613170.

Watch Martin'S Bulk Milk Service, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Martin'S Bulk Milk Service, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1101 WATER STREET
City
WILTON
State
WI
ZIP
54670
Mailing
1101 WATER STREET, WILTON, WI 54670
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484230
Employees
180
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10229.00 · Current $5114.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    On or about November 13, 2018 employees did not wear a chemical resistant personal protective equipment to protect employees arms, legs, head and torso when working with corrosive chemicals containing but not limited to:  hydrofluoric acid, sulfuric acid, quaternary ammonium compounds, sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5114
  • — Z (S) $10229

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5115.00 · Current $3836.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:    On or about November 13, 2018 a written respiratory protection program was not implemented for employees wearing a half mask (elastomeric) respirator while applying an acid solution and washing out the acid solution in a semi-trailer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3836
  • — Z (S) $5115

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about November 13, 2018, employees were not medically evaluated prior to wearing a half mask (elastomeric) respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    On or about November 13, 2018, employees were not fit tested prior to wearing a half mask (elastomeric) respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6819.00 · Current $5114.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    On or about November 13, 2018, employees used an acid solution to wash the inside floor of a semi-trailer and their exposure to hydrofluoric and sulfuric acid were not evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5114
  • — Z (S) $6819

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6819.00 · Current $5114.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:      On or about November 13, 2018, a quick drench eye wash was not provided for wash bay employees who work with corrosive chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5114
  • — Z (S) $6819

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10229.00 · Current $5114.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Storage of material created a hazard:    On or about November 20, 2018, incompatible chemicals were stored in close proximity.  In the event of accidental mixture of these chemicals may create an exothermic reaction creating excessive heat and possible chemical fire and or explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5114
  • — Z (S) $10229

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10229.00 · Current $5114.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1460214022602310

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     On or about November 13, 2018, a written hazard communication program was not implemented to train and inform employees of the physical and health hazards of the chemicals they work with.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5114
  • — Z (S) $10229

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1460214022602310

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:    On or about November 13, 2018, a written hazard communication program was not implemented to train and inform employees of the physical and health hazards of the chemicals they work with.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343613170.