Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DOCTOR ROOF CT LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DOCTOR ROOF CT LLC in 300 CONGRESS STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343687083.

Watch Doctor Roof CT LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Doctor Roof CT LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DOCTOR ROOF CT LLC
Site address
300 CONGRESS STREET
City
BRIDGEPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06604
Mailing
375 EAST MAIN STREET, BRANFORD, CT 06405
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   Location: 300 Congress Street, Bridgeport, CT 06604  Abatement certification and verification for Citation 002, Item 001 with a final order date of February 27, 2019  was not received within 10 calendar days (by March 9, 2019) following the abatement due date (February 27, 2019).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2273.00 · Current $2273.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.  Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employees exposed fall hazards of up to 9 feet above the lower level roof while re-roofing a flat roof on the mechanical penthouse were protected by the use of appropriate fall protection devices/systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  Jobsite: The employer did not verify through a written certification that the employees exposed to fall hazards while working on the roof of the mechanical penthouse were trained as complete.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343687083.