MANHATTAN, KS —
OSHA Inspection: JOHN CANNING CO
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of JOHN CANNING CO in 137 HALE LIBRARY, MANHATTAN, KS 66506 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 343720157.
Watch John Canning CO — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for John Canning CO is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOHN CANNING CO
- Site address
- 137 HALE LIBRARY
- City
- MANHATTAN
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 66506
- Mailing
- 150 COMMERCE CT, CHESHIRE, CT 06410
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
20 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.62 D01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $4508.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA): The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not complete an initial determination of the levels of lead.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4508.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 D01 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, including at least one sample for each job classification in each work area, either for each shift or for the shift with the highest exposure level: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not complete personal sampling representative of a full shift to determine the levels of lead.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $4508.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment, as required in 29 CFR 1926.62(d), and documented that the employee(s) performing any of the listed tasks was not exposed above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL), the employer did not treat affected employee(s) as if they were exposed above the PEL, and not in excess of ten times the PEL, and did not implement employee protective measures prescribed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v): The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not treat employees as if they were exposed above the PEL in failing to perform an employee exposure assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4508.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 D02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(ii): When the employer had any reason to believe that employee(s) had been exposed to lead in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) while performing a task not listed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required by 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and documented that the employee's lead exposure was not above the PEL, the employer did not treat the employee as if the employee was exposed above the PEL and did not implement employee protective measures as prescribed in 29 CFR 19126.62(d)(2)(v): The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not treat employees as if they were exposed above the PEL in failing to perform an employee exposure assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(A): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(f): The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not provide employees with proper respiratory protection until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 F01 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(f)(1)(iv): Respirators were not used during periods when respirators were required to provide interim protection for employees while they performed the operations specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2): The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not provide or require respirators to be used as interim protection for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $4508.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(C): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with change areas in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2): The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not provide adequate change areas for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4508.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 I02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(i): The employer did not provide clean change areas as an interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), without regard to the use of respirators: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not provide adequate change areas for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V D
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $4508.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(D): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with hand washing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5): The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not provide hand washing facilities for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4508.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 I05 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5)(i): The employer did not provide adequate handwashing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.51(f), for use by employees exposed to lead: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not provide hand washing facilities for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V E
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(E): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with biological monitoring in accordance with 1926.62(j)(1)(i), to consist of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not provide biological monitoring in the absence of an employee exposure assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 J01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(j)(1)(i): The employer did not make available initial medical surveillance, consisting of biological monitoring in the form of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels, to employees occupationally exposed on any day to lead at or above the action level: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not provide biological monitoring until many months into the project.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V F
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $4508.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(F): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with training in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.21, Safety training and education: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not provide training in the safe handling of lead and the associated hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4508.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 L01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i): 29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i): The employer did not include lead in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200), ensure that each employee had access to labels on containers of lead and safety data sheets, was trained in accordance with the provisions of the Hazard Communication standard and 29 CFR 1926.62(l), and ensure that all the following hazards were addressed: Reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not provide training in the safe handling of lead and the associated hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 G02 VII A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $4508.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(g)(2)(vii)(A): The employer did not ensure that the containers of contaminated protective clothing and equipment required by paragraph (g)(2)(v) of this section are labeled as follows: DANGER: CLOTHING AND EQUIPMENT CONTAMINATED WITH LEAD. MAY DAMAGE FERTILITY OR THE UNBORN CHILD. CAUSES DAMAGE TO THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM. DO NOT EAT, DRINK OR SMOKE WHEN HANDLING. DO NOT REMOVE DUST BY BLOWING OR SHAKING. DISPOSE OF LEAD CONTAMINATED WASH WATER IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL REGULATIONS. The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not ensure that contaminated PPE was labeled with the correct warning.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4508.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 H02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $4508.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(h)(2): Where possible, clean-up of floors and other surfaces where lead accumulated was not accomplished by vacuuming or other methods that minimized the likelihood of lead becoming airborne: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that employees dry swept the lead paint chips instead of using the HEPA vacuum.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4508.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 I02 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $4508.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(iii): The employer did not ensure that employees did not leave the workplace wearing any protective clothing or equipment that was required to be worn during the work shift: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not ensure that contaminated PPE was removed before leaving the contaminated workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4508.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 I04 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $4508.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(4)(iii): The employer did not ensure that employees whose airborne exposure to lead was above the permissible exposure limit, without regard to the use of a respirator, washed their hands and face prior to eating, drinking, smoking or applying cosmetics: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employees washed their hand and face prior to eating and drinking.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4508.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.62 I04 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $4508.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(4)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employees did not enter lunchroom facilities or eating areas with protective work clothing or equipment unless surface lead dust had been removed by vacuuming, downdraft booth, or other cleaning method that limited the dispersion of lead dust: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employees removed contaminated PPE before entering the eating area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4508.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3789.00 · Current $3221.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: The employer is failing to prevent employee exposure to lead hazards. The condition was most recently documented on February 28th, 2019, at 137 Hale Library, Manhattan KS. Employees engaged in paint removal activities in rooms 212 and 117 were exposed to lead hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employees were clean shaven before utilizing tight-fitting facepieces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $3220.65
- — Z (S) $3789
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA—2026-07-16
STELLA PAINTING INC.
GRIDLEY, CA—2026-07-15
EMPIRE PAINTING AND DECORATING INC
UNIVERSITY PLACE, WA—2026-07-15
WA317992082 - ALL SEASON PAINTING LLC
ANNAPOLIS, MD—2026-07-14
JOSE EMILIO SORTO
ANNAPOLIS, MD—2026-07-14
BLUE STAR CHESAPEAKE HOLDINGS, LLC
More inspections in KS
SHAWNEE, KS—2026-07-15
BECKER EXTERIORS
SHAWNEE, KS—2026-07-15
DLR RENOVATION
SHAWNEE, KS—2026-07-15
LUIS ARIAS
OLATHE, KS—2026-07-15
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
ARKANSAS CITY, KS—2026-07-15
SKYLINE HOMES
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343720157.