Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TOTAL FAB, L.L.C.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TOTAL FAB, L.L.C. in 99 ASH STREET, EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 343744538.

Watch Total FAB, L.L.C. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Total FAB, L.L.C. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TOTAL FAB, L.L.C.
Site address
99 ASH STREET
City
EAST HARTFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06108
Mailing
140-A COMMERCE STREET, EAST HAVEN, CT 06512
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.300 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3031.00 · Current $2122.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use:  On or about 01/29/2019 at the KIA of East Hartford Construction Project, the foreman was using an angle grinder with the guard removed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2121.7
  • — Z (S) $3031

1926.453 B02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $3713.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) working in an aerial lift were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket:  On or about 01/29/2018 at the KIA of East Hartford Construction Project, the foreman was standing and working from the top rail of the aerial lift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3712.8
  • — Z (S) $5304

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3789.00 · Current $2652.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated  On or about 01/29/2018 at the KIA of East Hartford Construction Project, the foreman was working from an aerial lift and was not using a personal fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2652.3
  • — Z (S) $3789

1926.760 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $3713.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1): Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems.  On or about 01/29/2019 at the KIA of East Hartford Construction Project, the foreman was straddling a steel beam with no fall protection system in use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3712.8
  • — Z (S) $5304

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343744538.