1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: ALDI (TEXAS) L.L.C.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of ALDI (TEXAS) L.L.C. in 777 US HIGHWAY 90A WEST, ROSENBERG, TX 77471 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 343774915.

Watch Aldi (Texas) L.L.C. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aldi (Texas) L.L.C. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALDI (TEXAS) L.L.C.
Site address
777 US HIGHWAY 90A WEST
City
ROSENBERG
State
TX
ZIP
77471
Mailing
777 US HIGHWAY 90A WEST, ROSENBERG, TX 77471
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
16000
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 F01 I B

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 134 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5683.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(B): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and did not address normal operations.  On or around February 6, 2019, at times prior thereto the employer at the Aldi Rosenberg Warehouse did not develop and implement procedures for administrative control of the three-way valve in the pressure relief system for the High Pressure Receiver (HPR-1).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5683
  • — Z (S) $5683

1910.119 G01 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11366.00 · Current $7528.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(i): The employer did not train each employee in the operating procedures as specified in paragraph (f) of this section before being involved in operating a newly assigned process.    At the ALDI Rosenberg warehouse in Rosenberg, Texas, the employer did not fully train each employee involved in logging readings from the Ammonia refrigeration process.     a) On or about February 6, 2019, and at times prior thereto at the ALDI Rosenberg warehouse in Rosenberg, Texas, the employer did not fully train a Team Lead on the Ammonia refrigeration system.    b) On or about February 6, 2019, and at times prior thereto at the ALDI Rosenberg warehouse in Rosenberg, Texas, the employer did not fully train a maintenance technician on the Ammonia refrigeration system.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $7528
  • — C (S) $11366
  • — Z (S) $11366

1910.119 J04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 12 instances 125 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7577.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): The employers inspection and testing procedures did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.  At the Aldi Warehouse in Rosenberg, Texas, the employer testing procedure for fixed ammonia monitors did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.  a) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Produce Penthouse, which houses Evaporators AU1 and AU2 with expired span gas.  b) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Docks Penthouse, which houses Evaporators AU3, AU4, and AU5 with expired span gas.  c) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Cooler Penthouse, which houses Evaporators AU6 and AU7 with expired span gas.  d) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Cooler Penthouse, which houses Evaporator AU8 with expired span gas.   e) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Meat Cooler Penthouse, which houses Evaporator AU9 with expired span gas.  f) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Docks Penthouse, which houses Evaporators AU10, AU11 and A12 with expired span gas.  g) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Freezer Penthouse, which houses Evaporators AU13 and AU14 with expired span gas.  h) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Freezer Penthouse, which houses Evaporators AU15 with expired span gas.   i) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Ice Cream Freezer Penthouse, which houses Evaporators AU16 and AU17 with expired span gas.  j) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Produce Penthouse, which houses Evaporators AU1 and AU2 with expired span gas.   k) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Produce Penthouse, which houses Evaporators AU1 and AU2 with expired span gas.  l) The employer performed testing of the ammonia monitor in the Produce Penthouse, which houses Evaporators AU1 and AU2 with expired span gas.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7577
  • — Z (S) $7577

1910.119 J04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9472.00 · Current $9472.00
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iii): The frequency of inspections and tests of process equipment was not consistent with applicable manufacturers' recommendations and good engineering practices, and more frequently if determined to be necessary by prior operating experience.    On or around February 6, 2019 and at times prior thereto at the Aldi Warehouse in Rosenberg, Texas, the employer's frequency of testing the Honeywell iR/F9 ammonia monitor in the engine room near the High Pressure Receiver was not consistent with the manufacturer recommendations.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $9472
  • — C (S) $9472
  • — Z (S) $9472

View ALDI (TEXAS) L.L.C.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343774915.