Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PRIME ECO GROUP, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of PRIME ECO GROUP, INC. in 2933 STATE HWY 60 S, WHARTON, TX 77488 (NAICS 325998). OSHA activity number 343799573.

Watch Prime ECO Group, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Prime ECO Group, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2933 STATE HWY 60 S
City
WHARTON
State
TX
ZIP
77488
Mailing
P.O. BOX 431, WHARTON, TX 77488
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325998
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4546.00 · Current $2728.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was established and implemented to include the provisions of (i)-(ix), as applicable:  On or about February 20, 2019, the employer did not develop or implement a written respiratory protection program for an employee who wears a respirator during painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2727.6
  • — Z (S) $4546

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   On or about February 20, 2019, at this facility, employees wore a respirator during chemical mixing and blending operations. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation prior to the employees using a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested and/or were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about February 20, 2019, at this facility, employees wore a respirator during chemical mixing and blending operations. The employer did not provide an annual fit-tested and/or initial fit-test prior to the employees using a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.32 B06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $644.00 · Current $386.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(6): The OSHA 300-A Summary was not posted by February 1 of the year following the year covered by the records and/or kept in place until April 30:   On or about February 20, 2019, at this establishment, the employer did not post their OSHA 300A summary for 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $386.4
  • — Z (O) $644

1910.146 C04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:  On or about February 20, 2019, and at times prior thereto, at this facility, employees entered permit spaces, such as but not limited to, tanks. The employer did not develop and implement an adequate permitted space program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:   On or about February 20, 2019, and at times prior thereto, at this facility, an employee performed lockout/tagout on a mixing tank. The employer did not an adequate lockout/tag out program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   At this facility, employees used various products containing hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, caustic sodium hydroxide, acids, organic solvents, polymers, and flammable liquids. The employer did not developed a program which would address labeling and other forms of warning on chemical containers, Safety Data Sheets, and employee information and training on the hazards associated with chemicals used at this site.  The written program must also contain the following:  1.  A list of all hazardous chemicals on site; 2.  The methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks involving chemicals, such as spill; 3.  The hazards of chemicals contained in piping that is not labeled; and, 4.  The method the employer will use to inform other employers (contractors) of the chemicals their employees might be exposed to while performing duties at this site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343799573.