Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TEXTRON GSE PREMIER INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TEXTRON GSE PREMIER INC in 2313 SHERMAN STREET, MARINETTE, WI 54143 (NAICS 336413). OSHA activity number 343799847.

Watch Textron GSE Premier INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Textron GSE Premier INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2313 SHERMAN STREET
City
MARINETTE
State
WI
ZIP
54143
Mailing
2313 SHERMAN STREET, MARINETTE, WI 54143
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336413
Employees
55
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $7577.00 · Current $3789.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(8): The cap (if equipped) and top step of a stepladder are not used as steps;     On or about February 21, 2019 an employee was standing on the top rung a 4 ft. Werner step ladder while accessing the top of a vehicle frame in the electrical department.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3788.5
  • — Z (S) $7577

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9472.00 · Current $4736.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle:     On or about February 21, 2019 the punch press operation on the Piranha iron worker was not guarded to prevent the operator's hand from contacting the downward punch stroke while in operation. The adjustable guard on the front of the punch did not prevent contact. The sides and back of the punch operation had not guarding installed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4736
  • — Z (S) $9472

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7577.00 · Current $3789.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, shall be constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section shall never be exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top shall never exceed one-fourth inch:     On or about February 21, 2019 the tongue guard on the Master Force Bench grinder exceeded the maximum 1/4 inch gap opening between the grinding wheel; the gap opening was measured at 1/2 inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3788.5
  • — Z (S) $7577

1910.305 B01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9472.00 · Current $4736.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Conductors entering cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings shall be protected from abrasion, and openings through which conductors enter shall be effectively closed:    On or about February 21, 2019 conductors entering the HEM Saw disconnect switch box were not protected from abrasion and the opening was not effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4736
  • — Z (S) $9472

1910.1026 D02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $9472.00 · Current $4736.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(iii): If monitoring reveals employee exposures to be at or above the action level, the employer shall perform periodic monitoring at least every six months.    On or about February 21, 2019 the employer had not performed periodic exposure monitoring every six months for chromium (VI) when exposure levels measured on or about January 25, 2017 had been found to be over the action level for employees performing welding (MIG and TIG) operations on stainless steel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4736
  • — Z (S) $9472

1910.1026 K01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1026(k)(1)(i)(A): The employer shall make medical surveillance available at no cost to the employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for all employees: Who are or may be occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year;  On or about February 21, 2019 the employer did not make medical surveillance available to employees who were or may have been occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year while employees were welding (MIG and TIG) on stainless steel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 L02 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i): The employer shall ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of at least the following: [A] the contents of this section; and [B] the purpose and description of the medical surveillance program required by paragraph (k) of this section:     On or about February 21, 2019 the employer did not provide information and training to employees on the contents of this section or the purpose and description of the medical surveillance program when employees were exposed to chromium (VI) while welding (MIG and TIG) on stainless steel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 I01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.184(i)(1): Sling identification. Each sling shall be marked or coded to show the rated capacities for each type of hitch and type of synthetic web material:   On or about February 21, 2019 a three inch wide synthetic sling used in conjunction with the mobile crane did not have an identification tag to identify its rated capacity.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343799847.