Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JAX AUTO SHIPPING LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JAX AUTO SHIPPING LLC in 142 COMMERCE COURT, RINCON, GA 31326 (NAICS 493190). OSHA activity number 343817508.

Watch JAX Auto Shipping LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JAX Auto Shipping LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
142 COMMERCE COURT
City
RINCON
State
GA
ZIP
31326
Mailing
142 COMMERCE COURT, RINCON, GA 31326
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493190
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 D07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3031.00 · Current $1970.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(7)(i): Suitable fire control devices, such as small hose or portable fire extinguishers, were not available at locations where flammable or combustible liquids were stored.    a). Yard Area - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, a fire control device (e.g. portable fire extinguisher) was not available at a storage tank that contained diesel fuel, thus exposing employees to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1970
  • — Z (S) $3031

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $3447.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s).    a). Yard Area - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, a Hyundai forklift (model: 70D-7E) was operated with a non-functional audible reverse alarm, an inoperable horn, and an inoperable forks positioner system, thus exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.    b). Yard Area - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, a Hyster Lift Truck (model: H120FT) was operated with a non-functional audible reverse alarm and with two worn front tires, thus exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.    c). Yard Area - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, a Toyota Forklift Truck (model: 7FDAU50) was operated with an inoperable horn and with two worn/damaged rear tires, thus exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.    d). Yard Area - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, a Toyota Forklift Truck (model: 7FDKU40) was operated with a non-functional audible reverse alarm, an inoperable horn, and with four worn/damaged front tires, thus exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3447
  • — Z (S) $5304

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined at least daily prior to being placed into service.    a). Yard Area - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, a Hyundai forklift (model: 70D-7E), a Hyster Lift Truck (model: H120FT), a Toyota Forklift Truck (model: 7FDAU50), and a Toyota Forklift Truck (model: 7FDKU40) were not inspected daily prior to being placed into service, thus exposing employees to stuck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2273.00 · Current $1477.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.    a). Yard Area - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees that handled hazardous chemicals to include, but not limited to diesel fuel, thus exposing employees to a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1477
  • — Z (S) $2273

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.    a). Yard Area - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, the employer did not have a safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical that was used to include, but not limited to diesel fuel, thus exposing employees to a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on the hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.    a). Yard Area - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, the employer did not provide chemical hazard training and information to employees that handled hazardous chemicals to include, but not limited to diesel fuel, thus exposing employees to a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(5): The employer did not evaluate the competency of the operator who had previously received training appropriate to the truck and working conditions encountered.    a). Yard Area - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, the employer did not evaluate the competency of employees who operated a Hyundai forklift (model: 70D-7E), a Hyster Lift Truck (model: H120FT), a Toyota Forklift Truck (model: 7FDAU50), and a Toyota Forklift Truck (model: 7FDKU40), thus exposing employees to a programmatic hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343817508.