Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MAURICIO ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MAURICIO ROOFING in 9542 COLUMBINE COURT, THORNTON, CO 80229 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343824850.

Watch Mauricio Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mauricio Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MAURICIO ROOFING
Site address
9542 COLUMBINE COURT
City
THORNTON
State
CO
ZIP
80229
Mailing
245 S. CANOSA COURT, DENVER, CO 80219
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2273.00 · Current $1250.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a)  Walter Construction, LLC, 9542 Columbine Court, Thornton, CO 80229:  On and before January 15, 2019, the employer did not ensure that employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, were not protected by protective helmets.  Employees were working under the roof, where other employees were performing roofing activities, without the use of protective helmets.  This condition exposed employees to the hazard of head injuries from being struck by falling materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1250
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a)  Walter Construction, LLC, 9542 Columbine Court, Thornton, CO  80229:  On and before January 15, 2019 the employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles from use of powered tools.  Employees were using pneumatic nail guns, or working in close proximity to these nail guns, without the use of safety glasses.  This condition exposed employees to the hazard of projectiles to the eyes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $1800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):   Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure:    a)  Walter Construction, LLC, 9542 Columbine Court, Thornton, CO  80229:  On and before January 15, 2019 the employer did not ensure that each employee engaged in roofing work were protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  Employees were reroofing a two-story single family residence, with a roof pitches of approximately 6/12 to 8/12, without the use of fall protection.  This condition exposed employees to fall hazards of up to approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1705.00 · Current $750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):    a)  Walter Construction, LLC, 9542 Columbine Court, Thornton, CO  80229:  On and before January 15, 2019, the employer did not use non-self-supporting ladders at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).  The base was extended beyond one-quarter of the working length.  This condition exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $750
  • — Z (S) $1705

1926.1053 B08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in any location where they can be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, or a barricade was not used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder:  a)  Walter Construction, LLC, 9542 Columbine Court, Thornton, CO  80229:  On and before January 15, 2019, the employer did not ensure that ladders placed in the front door walk-way were secured to prevent accidental displacement, or that a barricade was used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder.  This condition exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343824850.