VESTAL, NY —
OSHA Inspection: DUSTIN SQUIER
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of DUSTIN SQUIER in THE SHARON APARTMENTS, 4131 BURRIS ROAD, VESTAL, NY 13850 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343861514.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DUSTIN SQUIER
- Site address
- THE SHARON APARTMENTS, 4131 BURRIS ROAD
- City
- VESTAL
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13850
- Mailing
- 123 STEWART ROAD, CONKLIN, NY 13748
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (J)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B04
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2842.00 · Current $1847.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights), more than six feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes: a) Access way between center building and northernmost building, second and third floors, on or about 3-19-19: Employees were using an unprotected stair opening for ladder access to upper floors, without fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 9 feet 6inches from floor 3 to floor 2 and 22 feet 6 inches from floor 2 to the basement below. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1847
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2842.00 · Current $1847.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Northeast corner of building complex, south panel of roof, on or about 3-19-19: Three employees were working on a sloped roof (4:12 pitch) and were not protected from falls, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 40 feet 2 inches from the eave to the ground below. b) Northeast corner of building complex, south panel of roof, on or about 3-19-19: Three employees were working on a sloped roof (4:12 pitch) and were not protected from falls, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of up to 52 feet 2 inches from the gable end to the ground below. c) Northeast corner of building complex, south panel of roof, on or about 3-19-19: Three employees were working on a sloped roof (4:12 pitch) and were not protected from falls, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of up to 20 feet through trusses from the sheathing to the third floor deck below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1847
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: a) Northeast corner of building complex, south panel of roof, on or about 3-19-19: Three employees were working on a sloped roof (4:12 pitch) and were not protected from falls, in that they could fall more than 6 feet due to excess slack in their safety ropes, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 40 feet 2 inches from the eave to the ground below. b) Northeast corner of building complex, south panel of roof, on or about 3-19-19: Three employees were working on a sloped roof (4:12 pitch) and were not protected from falls, in that they could fall more than 6 feet due to excess slack in their safety ropes, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of up to 52 feet 2 inches from the gable end to the ground below. c) Northeast corner of building complex, south panel of roof, on or about 3-19-19: Three employees were working on a sloped roof (4:12 pitch) and were not protected from falls, in that they could fall more than 6 feet due to excess slack in their safety ropes, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of up to 20 feet through trusses from the sheathing to the third floor deck below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D06 III
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2842.00 · Current $1846.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(iii): A snaphook was engaged to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached: a) Northeast corner of building complex, south panel of roof, on or about 3-19-19: Three employees were working on a sloped roof (4:12 pitch) with snap hooks engaged to a single D-ring to which other connectors were attached.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1846
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.503 A02 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used: a) Entire roof, on or about 3-19-19: Three employees were installing roof sheathing on a roof, without the training necessary for the employees to recognize the hazards associated with falls and their work as well as the use and operation of the fall arrest systems being utilized. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
FAIRHOPE, AL—2026-07-16
FRANCISCO ARES
WOODHAVEN, MI—2026-07-16
G.J. PERELLI CO., L.L.C.
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
BERLIN, NJ—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-15
TRIPLE R CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in NY
MAYVILLE, NY—2026-07-16
MAYVILLE VILLAGE DPW
NEW HYDE PARK, NY—2026-07-16
NORTH HEMPSTEAD TN MICHAEL J TULLY PARK
CONESUS, NY—2026-07-16
CONESUS TN HIGHWAY DEPT
COMSTOCK, NY—2026-07-15
NYSDOCCS WASHINGTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
BALDWINSVILLE, NY—2026-07-15
LYSANDER TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343861514.