Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JOEY OSBORNE, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JOEY OSBORNE, LLC in 177 LEXINGTON AVENUE, PROVIDENCE, RI 02907 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343877619.

Watch Joey Osborne, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Joey Osborne, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOEY OSBORNE, LLC
Site address
177 LEXINGTON AVENUE
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02907
Mailing
718 CHARLES STREET, PROVIDENCE, RI 02904
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) Establishment:  As of June 21, 2019, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for Citation 1, Items 1b and 2c from inspection number 1387761, issued on 04/02/2019, with a final order date of 06/07/2019.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  (a) Establishment:  As of June 21, 2019, the employer had not provided the required abatement documentation to OSHA for Citation 1, Items 1b and 2c from inspection number 1387761, issued on 04/02/2019, with a final order date of 06/07/2019.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/26/2019, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from falls while working on a roof surface, approximately twelve feet above the lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/26/2019, the employer did not ensure that each employee was trained in fall protection, and that a written certification of the training existed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):  (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/26/2019, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while ascending and descending an extension ladder that was leaning against a wall approximately fourteen feet in height, with the base of the ladder approximately sixteen feet in distance from the face of the wall, instead of maintaining a 4 to 1 ratio, which would have positioned the base of the ladder between three and four feet off the face of the wall.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.1053 B20

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(20): Employees did not face the ladder when ascending or descending the ladder:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/26/2019, the employer did not ensure that an employee ascended and descended an extension ladder while facing the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/26/2019, the employer did not provide adequate training to employees who use ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.416 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/26/2019, the employer did not ensure that a damaged flexible cord, with torn outer insulation, was taken out of service before being plugged in and used to power a Porter-Cable Multi-Material Saw.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343877619.