Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SPRINGWORKS FARM

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SPRINGWORKS FARM in 349 LISBON STREET, LISBON, ME 04250 (NAICS 111219). OSHA activity number 343945499.

Watch Springworks Farm — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Springworks Farm is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SPRINGWORKS FARM
Site address
349 LISBON STREET
City
LISBON
State
ME
ZIP
04250
Mailing
347 LISBON STREET, LISBON, ME 04250
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
111219
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2273.00 · Current $2273.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  Facility - A written respiratory protection program was not developed or implemented in the facility where employees are required to use tight-fitting respirators while conducting seeding operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2273
  • — I (S) $1591.1
  • — Z (S) $2273

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.  Facility - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine employees' ability to use the required tight-fitting respirators during seeding operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   Facility - The employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators during the seeding procedures passed an appropriate fit test.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  Facility - The employer did not provide training to employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators during seeding operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3789.00 · Current $3789.00
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:  GH-1 Wash Area - Two receptacle boxes and one switch box did not have covers.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $3789
  • — I (S) $2652.3
  • — Z (S) $3789

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $758.00 · Current $758.00
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent.  Facility - The employer did not maintain injury and illness logs of employee work-related injuries and illnesses.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (O) $758
  • — I (O) $530.6
  • — Z (O) $758

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   Facility - The employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program for employees working with cleaners and fertilizers.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (O) $0
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343945499.