Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SHAWN STONEKING CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SHAWN STONEKING CORPORATION in 50 S PRAIRIE ST., GALESBURG, IL 61401 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 343954582.

Watch Shawn Stoneking Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Shawn Stoneking Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
50 S PRAIRIE ST.
City
GALESBURG
State
IL
ZIP
61401
Mailing
3021 W JACKSON, MACOMB, IL 61455
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238910
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $191.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:    On August 09, 2019, Shawn Stoneking Corporation dba Stoneking & Sons Excavating and Demolition, was issued citations and the employer did not verify within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, through written certification, that each citation was abated.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $191.2
  • — C (O) $319
  • — Z (O) $319

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $191.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.    On August 09, 2019, Shawn Stoneking Corporation dba Stoneking & Sons Excavating and Demolition, was issued citations and the employer did not provide the required documentation that each citation was abated.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $191.2
  • — C (O) $319
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $2387.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or about April 19, 2019, employees were exposed to fall hazards approximately 19 feet to the ground below while performing demolition activities and the employer did not ensure a suitable fall protection system was used.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2386.8
  • — C (S) $3978
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person:    On or about April 19, 2019, employees were exposed to fall hazards approximately 19 feet to the ground below while performing demolition activities and the employer did not ensure the anchor point was inspected by a qualified person prior to being used by employees.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $2387.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training or when employer relied on training conducted by another employer, the certification record needs to indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:    On or about April 19, 2019, employees were exposed to fall hazards approximately 19 feet to the ground below while performing demolition activities and the employer did not certify, through a written record, the employees training with a previous employer was adequate.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2386.8
  • — C (S) $3978
  • — Z (S) $3978

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343954582.