Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SARA LEE CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SARA LEE CORPORATION in 4000 MEACHAM BLVD., HALTOM CITY, TX 76117 (NAICS 493120). OSHA activity number 343962536.

Watch Sara LEE Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sara LEE Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4000 MEACHAM BLVD.
City
HALTOM CITY
State
TX
ZIP
76117
Mailing
4000 MEACHAM BLVD., HALTOM CITY, TX 76117
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493120
Employees
94
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 I F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9472.00 · Current $5683.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(F): The employers compilation of written process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include an accurate representation of the design codes and standards employed;    On or about April 26, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employers compilation of written process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the specific consensus standard employed addressing the ammonia refrigeration equipment at the facility.  The process safety information also did not include the version or the date of the ANSI/IIAR and ASHRAE consensus standard being utilized and currently in effect.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5683.2
  • — Z (S) $9472

1910.119 D03 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13260.00 · Current $7956.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.    a. On or about April 26, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure the machinery room was kept free of combustible materials such as, ceiling tiles, cardboard boxes, paper, plastic binders, bags, and a coffee maker box in accordance with ANSI/IIAR 2-2014 Standard for Safe Design of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Refrigeration Systems, Chapter 6 Machinery Rooms, 6.4 Combustible Materials.  Combustible materials shall not be stored in machinery rooms outside of approved fire-rated storage containers.    b. On or about April 26, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the king valves in the machinery room were readily accessible in accordance with ANSI/IIAR 2-2014 Standard for Safe Design of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Refrigeration Systems, Chapter 6 Machinery Rooms, 6.3 Access and Egress, 6.3.3 Access to Valves, 6.3.3.2 Manually operated isolation valves identified as being part of the system emergency shutdown procedure shall be directly operable from the floor or chain operated from a permanent work surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7956
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.119 J02

Serious Gravity 10 10 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13260.00 · Current $7956.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish written and implement procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment.    The employer did not implement their mechanical integrity program for ammonia process equipment by not performing or completing the following:    Pressure Vessels and Heat Exchanger  a. On or about April 26, 2019, Sara Lee had not tested the critical isolation valves associated with the heat exchanger (HE-1) every 6 months in accordance with its mechanical integrity program.    Compressors  b. On or about April 26, 2019 Sara Lee did not conduct an annual inspection of Compressor C-3 in accordance with its mechanical Integrity program  c. On or about April 26, 2019 Sara Lee had not tested the safety cutouts every six-months for Compressors C-3, in accordance with its mechanical integrity program.  d. On or about April 26, 2019 Sara Lee had not conducted the six-month compressor safety check in 2019 for Compressor C-3 in accordance with its mechanical integrity program.    Pressure Relief Valves  g. On or about April 26, 2019 Sara Lee did not conduct performance testing on pressure relief valves that had been removed from service in accordance with its mechanical integrity program.    Critical Valve Testing  h. The employer did not conduct a six-month critical valve test in July 2019 for Evaporators AU-4, and AU-8, in July 2019 for the Heat Exchanger HE-1, V2-P1, and in June 2019 for V2-P2, V3-P1, V3-P2-in accordance with its mechanical integrity program.    Pumps  i. On or about April 26, 2019, Sara Lee did not perform quarterly or annual preventative maintenance for Pumps V-2-P1, V-2-P2, V3-P1, V3-P2 in accordance with its mechanical integrity program.    Ventilation System  j. On or about April 26, 2019, the employer did not perform inspection and tests on the engine room ventilation system on a monthly basis. A visual inspection and motor test was not performed in February through April 2019 in accordance with its mechanical integrity program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7956
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.119 J04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13260.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): Inspection and testing procedures did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.  a. On or about April 26, 2019, the employer did not perform monthly testing in February and May 2019 to verify that the warning lights and audio alarms connected to the ammonia detectors/monitoring system function properly when activated; in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as, but not limited to, the Sara Lee mechanical integrity program.  b. On or about April 26, 2019, the employer did not perform annual testing of the audio and visual alarms connected to the ammonia detectors/monitoring system to assure that the alarms function properly when activated; in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as, but not limited to, IIAR-2, 2014 Standard for Safe Design of Closed-Circuit Ammonia Refrigeration Systems Section 17.3.2.  c. On or about April 26, 2019, the employer did not perform inspection and testing of the alarm connected to the continuous exhaust ventilation system to assure that the alarm functions properly in the event flow through the continuous exhaust stops; in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as, but not limited to, the Sara Lee mechanical integrity program.  d. On or about April 26, 2019, the employer did not perform testing of the safety cutouts on process equipment. At yearly intervals the safety cutouts for Ammonia Pumps V-2-P1, V-2-P2, V3-P1, and V3-P2 were not inspected for wear or damage which could affect its operation in accordance with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices, such as, but not limited to, IIAR Bulletin 110, 1993, Section 6.5.3 and the Sara Lee mechanical integrity program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.119 J04 IV

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5683.00 · Current $3410.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iv): The employer did not document each inspection and test that had been performed on process equipment.  The documentation did not identify the date of the inspection or test, the name of the person who performed the inspection or test, the serial number or other identifier of the equipment on which the inspection or test was performed, a description of the inspection or test performed, and the results of the inspection or test.     a. The employer did not document for Compressor 1 (C-1), (12 month-Ammonia Compressor Inspection, Work Order 112222), the date of the inspection or test, the name of the person who performed the inspection or test, and the results of the inspection or test.    b. The employer did not document for each inspection on compressors, pumps, piping, the pressure relief system, pressure vessels, critical valves, and the emergency shutdown system a description of the inspection or test performed and the results of the inspection or test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3409.8
  • — Z (S) $5683

1910.120 Q01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13260.00 · Current $7956.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations.      a. The employer did not implement the provisions of its emergency response plan in that the refrigeration maintenance employees had not received First Responder Awareness Level training in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(i).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7956
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $13260.00 · Current $7956.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not permit respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who have facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interferes with valve function.    On or about April 26, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employer allowed tight-fitting respirators to be worn by employees with facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7956
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.305 G01 IV A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9472.00 · Current $5683.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure.    a. On or about April 26, 2019, and times prior thereto, flexible cords secured to metal conduit were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of the structure in the machinery room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5683.2
  • — Z (S) $9472

View SARA LEE CORPORATION's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343962536.