Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: NEUPMANN BUILDERS, LLC

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of NEUPMANN BUILDERS, LLC in 499 SILVERMINE ROAD, NEW CANAAN, CT 06840 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 343966289.

Watch Neupmann Builders, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Neupmann Builders, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
499 SILVERMINE ROAD
City
NEW CANAAN
State
CT
ZIP
06840
Mailing
83 STANWOOD DRIVE, NEW BRITAIN, CT 06053
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $2780.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section:    JOBSITE:  The employees preparing to install a lunette window on a steep pitched (10 in 12 pitch) roof were not protected from falling between 8 feet 7 inches to 28 feet 6 inches to the ground by the use of guardrails, personal fall arrest system or other equivalent means.    On or about 04/23/19, one of employees prepared to install a lunette window on a steep pitched (10 in 12 pitch) roof slipped and fell to a lower steep pitched (10 in 12 pitch) roof then fell 8 feet 7 inches to the concrete ground. The employee sustained severe laceration to his forehead and a severely sprained left knee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2780
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  JOBSITE:  The employer did not ensure that each employee exposed to fall hazard while performing roofing activities, was protected through training to recognize  the hazards of falling and the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $1990.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grab rail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:    JOBSITE: The side rails of the following extension ladders used by employees for access, did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surfaces:    1. Werner blue 20-foot extension ladder.  2. Aluminum 32-foot extension ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1990
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $1990.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).    JOBSITE:  The angles of the following extension ladders were not used such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladders was approximately one-quarter the working length of the ladder:    1. Blue Werner 20-foot extension ladder.  2. Aluminum 32-foot extension ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1990
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:  JOBSITE:  The employer did not ensure that each employee using the following ladders to access upper levels was provided with ladder training to recognize hazards and the procedures to minimize the hazards:  1. Werner blue 20-foot extension ladder. 2. Aluminum 32-foot extension ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  JOBSITE:  The employer did not ensure that each employee performing construction activities had received training to recognize hazards and the procedures to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343966289.