Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CASIMIRO GALLARDO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CASIMIRO GALLARDO in 9701 N. COUNCIL RD., OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73162 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344081864.

Watch Casimiro Gallardo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Casimiro Gallardo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CASIMIRO GALLARDO
Site address
9701 N. COUNCIL RD.
City
OKLAHOMA CITY
State
OK
ZIP
73162
Mailing
3016 S. 101ST EAST AVE. APT. E, TULSA, OK 74128
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2273.00 · Current $2273.00
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated:   On or about June 11, 2019, the employer did not ensure that an employee, installing framing material to a building, was in use of fall protection while working from an aerial lift.  The employee was exposed to a fall hazard greater than six (6) feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    On or about June 11, 2019, at the jobsite the employer did not ensure that employees, performing framing work activities, were in use of fall protection and were exposed to a fall greater than six (6) feet to the ground below:  1) An employee, performing framing work activities, was working from a third story building by a window opening and was not in use of any fall protection.    2) Two employees were working from the roof of a building that was more than 6 feet to the ground and were not in use of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344081864.