Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CHAD MILLS DBA BETTER BUILDERS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CHAD MILLS DBA BETTER BUILDERS in 201 S. 10TH ST., MASCOUTAH, IL 62258 (NAICS 236117). OSHA activity number 344148291.

Watch Chad Mills DBA Better Builders — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Chad Mills DBA Better Builders is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
201 S. 10TH ST.
City
MASCOUTAH
State
IL
ZIP
62258
Mailing
436 SOUTH 4TH, CASEYVILLE, IL 62232
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236117
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 10/23/2019 with an abatement date of 11/19/2019, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating the complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. b)  For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 10/23/2019 with an abatement date of 11/19/2019, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating the complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately 15 feet off the roof eve when they were installing roof sheathing.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the between the foot and the top support).     The employer did not ensure that a non-self-supporting ladder was used as the manufacturer designed.  Employees performing residential roof sheathing operations were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately fifteen (15) feet while using a 20 foot non-self-supporting ladder; that was not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344148291.