Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DRIVEWAY SEALING INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DRIVEWAY SEALING INC. in 8883 SHELLMAN DRIVE WEST, CICERO, NY 13039 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 344180674.

Watch Driveway Sealing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Driveway Sealing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8883 SHELLMAN DRIVE WEST
City
CICERO
State
NY
ZIP
13039
Mailing
271 COUNTY ROUTE 84, WEST MONROE, NY 13167
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 7/24/19:  A worker was observed dry cutting a driveway surface with a demolition saw without having eye protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1000
  • — C (S) $3978
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 7/24/19:  A worker was observed dry cutting a driveway surface with a demolition saw without the employer having conducted exposure assessments.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $2842
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 7/24/19:  A worker was observed dry cutting a driveway surface with a demolition saw without the employer having conducted exposure assessments.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 E01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1153(e)(1)(ii): Respiratory protection was not provided for tasks not listed in Table 1, or where the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection described in Table 1:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 7/24/19:  A worker was observed dry cutting a driveway surface with a demolition saw without the employer ensuring that a respirator was used.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 7/24/19:  A worker was observed dry cutting a driveway surface with a demolition saw without the employer providing an exposure control plan.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(1) referencing 1926.59: The employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200):    a)  At the jobsite, on or about 7/24/19:  A worker was observed dry cutting a driveway surface with a demolition saw without having a HAZCOM program or training on the hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2842
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1153 I02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 7/24/19:  A worker was observed dry cutting a driveway surface with a demolition saw without having a HAZCOM program or training on the hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2842
  • — Z (S) $2842

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344180674.