OSHA Inspection: HOME LEASING CONSTRUCTION

Issued

2020-01-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $6747.00 · Current $6747.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):  a) Thurston Road, Rochester NY - On or about and prior to 7/23/19, contractor employees were working in an area where paint chips contained between 0.0409%-0.5506% lead.  The controlling employer did not determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA).  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED

Issued

2020-01-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $6747.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i): 29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i):  The employer did not include lead in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200),  ensure that each employee had access to labels on containers of lead and safety data sheets,  was trained in accordance with the provisions of the Hazard Communication standard and 29 CFR 1926.62(l), and ensure that all the following hazards were addressed: Reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects:  a) Thurston Road, Rochester, NY - On or about and prior to 7/30/19, contractor employees working in an area where paint chips contained between 0.0409%-0.5506% lead.  The controlling employer did not include lead in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200): ensure that each contract employee had access to safety data sheets; was trained in accordance with the provisions of the Hazard Communication Standard and 29 CFR 1926.62(l); and ensure that all the following hazards were addressed: reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED

Issued

2020-01-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $6747.00 · Current $6747.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  a) Thurston Road, Rochester, NY - On or about and prior to 7/23/19, contractor employees performing demolition activities used demo saws to cut and break speed block, concrete block, and clay tiles.  This work was all performed dry without the use of any water or devices equipped with an integrated water delivery system that continuously feeds water to the device.  Contract employees were engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the controlling employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, and did not assess and limit the exposure of contract employees to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED

Issued

2020-01-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  a) Thurston Road, Rochester, NY - On or about and, and prior to 7/23/19, contractor employees performing demolition activities used demo saws to cut and break speed block, concrete block, and clay tiles.  This work was all performed dry without the use of any water or devices equipped with an integrated water delivery system that continuously feeds water to the device.  The controlling employer did not assess the exposure of each contract employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED

Issued

2020-01-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $6747.00 · Current $6747.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(f)(1):  The employer allowed dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica and wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods that minimize the likelihood of exposure were feasible.  a) Thurston Road, Rochester, NY - On or about, and prior to 7/23/19, the controlling employer allowed dry sweeping where such activity could contribute to contract employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica.  Contract employees dry swept and shoveled debris containing respirable crystalline silica from the floors.  Bulk samples taken from the area revealed debris taken from the area contained 3%-10% crystalline silica.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED

Issued

2020-01-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $6747.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan that contained at least the following elements:     (i) A description of the tasks in the workplace that involve exposure to respirable crystalline silica;     (ii) A description of the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica for each task;     (iii) A description of the housekeeping measures used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica; and     (iv) A description of the procedures used to restrict access to work areas, when necessary, to minimize the number of employees exposed to respirable crystalline silica and their level of exposure, including exposures generated by other employers or sole proprietors.  a) Thurston Road, Rochester, NY - On or about, and prior to 7/23/19, the controlling employer did not established and implement a written exposure control plan which contained the elements required in 1926.1153(g)(1)(i) through (iv).  Contract employees dry swept and shoveled debris containing respirable crystalline silica from the floors and performed demolition activities used demo saws to cut and break speed block, concrete block, and clay tiles containing crystalline silica.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED

Issued

2020-01-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $6747.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(1): The employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200):  a) Thurston Road, Rochester, NY - On or about, and prior to 7/23/19, the controlling employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard including written program, safety data sheets, and employee information and training.  Contract employees dry swept and shoveled debris containing respirable crystalline silica from the floors and performed demolition activities using demo saws to cut and break speed block, concrete block, and clay tiles containing crystalline silica.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED