Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BRIAN CASEY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BRIAN CASEY in 342 JEAN COURT, SHELTON, CT 06484 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 344206255.

Watch Brian Casey — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brian Casey is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BRIAN CASEY
Site address
342 JEAN COURT
City
SHELTON
State
CT
ZIP
06484
Mailing
49 OVERLOOK DR., MILFORD, CT 06460
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Location: 342 Jean Court, Shelton, CT 06484  a) Abatement documentation and certification for Citation 01. Item 001a with a Final Order date of September 20, 2019 was not received within 10 calendar days (by September 16, 2019) following the Abatement Due Date (September 6, 2019).  b) Abatement documentation and certification for Citation 01. Item 001b with a Final Order date of September 20, 2019 was not received within 10 calendar days (by September 30, 2019) following the Abatement Due Date (September 20, 2019).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3410.00 · Current $3410.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee working/painting from the residential roof was protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3410

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee required to work from the roof at a height above 6 feet was provided training and information in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344206255.