SHELTON, CT —
OSHA Inspection: BRIAN CASEY
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BRIAN CASEY in 342 JEAN COURT, SHELTON, CT 06484 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 344206255.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRIAN CASEY
- Site address
- 342 JEAN COURT
- City
- SHELTON
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06484
- Mailing
- 49 OVERLOOK DR., MILFORD, CT 06460
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 342 Jean Court, Shelton, CT 06484 a) Abatement documentation and certification for Citation 01. Item 001a with a Final Order date of September 20, 2019 was not received within 10 calendar days (by September 16, 2019) following the Abatement Due Date (September 6, 2019). b) Abatement documentation and certification for Citation 01. Item 001b with a Final Order date of September 20, 2019 was not received within 10 calendar days (by September 30, 2019) following the Abatement Due Date (September 20, 2019).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3410.00 · Current $3410.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee working/painting from the residential roof was protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3410
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee required to work from the roof at a height above 6 feet was provided training and information in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
FREEHOLD, NJ—2026-07-10
SPECTRA PAINTING, INC
WILLIAMSPORT, PA—2026-07-10
INTERNATIONAL PAINT PROS
RIVIERA BEACH, FL—2026-07-09
PINMAR USA INC.
REDDING, CA—2026-07-08
NICK MAYS PAINTING INC
MILWAUKEE, WI—2026-07-08
CALICHAPIN PAINTING AND LITTLE MORE, LLC
More inspections in CT
BRIDGEPORT, CT—2026-07-10
WRR, INC.
BERLIN, CT—2026-07-10
MMF CONSTRUCTION LLC
NAUGATUCK, CT—2026-07-08
WHITING-TURNER LCT2 JOINT VENTURE
SOMERS, CT—2026-07-08
F&G RECYCLING LLC
STAMFORD, CT—2026-07-07
FAIRFIELD AVENUE MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344206255.