NORTH HAMPTON, NH —
OSHA Inspection: MG GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MG GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP in 44 LAFAYETTE ROAD, NORTH HAMPTON, NH 03862 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344215975.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MG GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP
- Site address
- 44 LAFAYETTE ROAD
- City
- NORTH HAMPTON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03862
- Mailing
- 4 BRACKETT ROAD, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01702
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: a. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019. b. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019. c. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019. d. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019. e. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 5 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2842.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide a competent person to conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2842.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Site- Employees accessing the roof from an aluminum extension ladder were not protected from a fall hazard where the top of the ladder extended approximately 18 inches above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2842.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Site- An employee operating a pneumatic nail gun was not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not worn.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3978.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from falls between approximately 12 and 25 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2842.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Site- Each employee exposed to a fall hazard was not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2842
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in NH
PORTSMOUTH, NH—2026-07-15
RODAS CONSTRUCTION CORP
DOVER, NH—2026-07-15
KNOX MARSH DEVELOPMENT LLC
DOVER, NH—2026-07-15
REAL PRO BUILDERS CONSTRUCTION INC
MERRIMACK, NH—2026-07-15
BURGER KING
MILFORD, NH—2026-07-15
R G EXTERIORS, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344215975.