Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MG GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MG GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP in 44 LAFAYETTE ROAD, NORTH HAMPTON, NH 03862 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344215975.

Watch MG General Construction Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MG General Construction Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
44 LAFAYETTE ROAD
City
NORTH HAMPTON
State
NH
ZIP
03862
Mailing
4 BRACKETT ROAD, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01702
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  a.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019.  b.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019.  c.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019.  d.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019.  e.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 5 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)    Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide a competent person to conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    Site- Employees accessing the roof from an aluminum extension ladder were not protected from a fall hazard where the top of the ladder extended approximately 18 inches above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    Site- An employee operating a pneumatic nail gun was not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from falls between approximately 12 and 25 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Site- Each employee exposed to a fall hazard was not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2842

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344215975.