Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HUGO PEREZ CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HUGO PEREZ CONSTRUCTION in 400 MAIN AVENUE, NORWALK, CT 06851 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344233754.

Watch Hugo Perez Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hugo Perez Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
400 MAIN AVENUE
City
NORWALK
State
CT
ZIP
06851
Mailing
2323 FULTON STREET, AURORA, CO 80010
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $325.00 · Current $325.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Location: 400 Main Street, Norwalk, CT 06851  Abatement certification and documentation for Citation 01, Item 001b (29 CFR 1926.503(a)(a)) with a Final Order Date of February 3, 2020 was not received within 10 calendar days (by November 24, 2019) following the Abatement Due Date (November 14, 2019).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $325

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:  Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that each employee engaged in re-roofing activities on a 4 in 12 pitch commercial roof was protected from fall hazards approximately 28 feet 7 inches to the lower level by the use of appropriate fall protection systems/devices.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards while working on the roof were not provided training and information in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Jobsite:  The side rails of the extension ladder that was used by employees to gain access to the roof did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

View HUGO PEREZ CONSTRUCTION's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344233754.