Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,783,325Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PEDRO FLORES-GUERRERO DBA PEDRO FLORES-GUERRERO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PEDRO FLORES-GUERRERO DBA PEDRO FLORES-GUERRERO in 10620 S. CENTRAL AVE. APT. 1A, CHICAGO RIDGE, IL 60415 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344358783.

Watch Pedro Flores-Guerrero DBA Pedro Flores-Guerrero — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pedro Flores-Guerrero DBA Pedro Flores-Guerrero is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10620 S. CENTRAL AVE. APT. 1A
City
CHICAGO RIDGE
State
IL
ZIP
60415
Mailing
5810 S. FAIRFIELD AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60629
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $325.00 · Current $325.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer did not certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a. On or about March 31, 2020 - the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected:  Citation Number                Item Number            Abatement Date 01                                    003                            02/28/2020
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $325

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1735.00 · Current $1735.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a.  On or about October 4, 2019, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee working on the ground, below roofing activities, was not wearing a hard hat to protect against falling materials and debris.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1735

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4048.00 · Current $4048.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a.  On or about October 4, 2019, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, approximately twenty-eight (28') feet above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2892.00 · Current $2892.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a.  On or about October 4, 2019, at the above addressed jobsite, the employees conducting roofing operations were not provided training on how to minimize fall hazards, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2892

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2892.00 · Current $2892.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  a.  On or about October 4, 2019, at the above addressed jobsite, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3') feet above the upper landing surface, was not secured at its top to a rigid support, and a grasping device was not provided, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2892

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344358783.