Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: KAJO CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KAJO CONSTRUCTION LLC in 76 BERLIN ROAD, CROMWELL, CT 06416 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344429154.

Watch Kajo Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kajo Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
76 BERLIN ROAD
City
CROMWELL
State
CT
ZIP
06416
Mailing
11 MANNIONS LANE APT 12, DANBURY, CT 06810
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3031.00 · Current $3031.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials and equipment to be made by competent person(s):  Jobsite: A competent person did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment as required.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3031

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards while working on the building were not provided with training and information in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite: The employees using the extension ladder to access the portico were not provided with training and information in the proper means to erect the ladder, recognize hazards and the procedures to minimize any hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3789.00 · Current $3789.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  Jobsite:   1.    Employees were framing the portico and sheathing the roof trusses with pneumatic nail guns without wearing eye protections.  2.    An employee was using a Ryobi 15-Amp 12-inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw to cut framing lumber without wearing an eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3789

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3789.00 · Current $3789.00
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift:  Jobsite:  The employee who was installing exterior sheathing from the bucket of an aerial lift at a height approximately 25 feet above the ground was not attached to the boom or basket by wearing a body belt with lanyard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3789

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5304.00 · Current $5304.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:  Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employees exposed fall hazards while performing the following tasks were protected from fall hazards:  1.    The employees framing the portico.  2.    The employees installing sheathing on the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5304

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3789.00 · Current $3789.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Jobsite:  The side rails of the extension ladder used by employees to gain access to the portico at a height approximately 12 feet above the ground did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3789

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344429154.