CROMWELL, CT —
OSHA Inspection: KAJO CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KAJO CONSTRUCTION LLC in 76 BERLIN ROAD, CROMWELL, CT 06416 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344429154.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KAJO CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 76 BERLIN ROAD
- City
- CROMWELL
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06416
- Mailing
- 11 MANNIONS LANE APT 12, DANBURY, CT 06810
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3031.00 · Current $3031.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials and equipment to be made by competent person(s): Jobsite: A competent person did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment as required.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3031
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards while working on the building were not provided with training and information in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees using the extension ladder to access the portico were not provided with training and information in the proper means to erect the ladder, recognize hazards and the procedures to minimize any hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3789.00 · Current $3789.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Jobsite: 1. Employees were framing the portico and sheathing the roof trusses with pneumatic nail guns without wearing eye protections. 2. An employee was using a Ryobi 15-Amp 12-inch Sliding Compound Miter Saw to cut framing lumber without wearing an eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3789
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3789.00 · Current $3789.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: Jobsite: The employee who was installing exterior sheathing from the bucket of an aerial lift at a height approximately 25 feet above the ground was not attached to the boom or basket by wearing a body belt with lanyard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3789
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5304.00 · Current $5304.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employees exposed fall hazards while performing the following tasks were protected from fall hazards: 1. The employees framing the portico. 2. The employees installing sheathing on the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5304
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3789.00 · Current $3789.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Jobsite: The side rails of the extension ladder used by employees to gain access to the portico at a height approximately 12 feet above the ground did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3789
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
FAIRHOPE, AL—2026-07-16
FRANCISCO ARES
WOODHAVEN, MI—2026-07-16
G.J. PERELLI CO., L.L.C.
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
BERLIN, NJ—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-15
TRIPLE R CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in CT
ENFIELD, CT—2026-07-16
MOMS ENFIELD
DAYVILLE, CT—2026-07-16
HARBOR FREIGHT
NEW BRITAIN, CT—2026-07-14
JANANII, LLC
NEWINGTON, CT—2026-07-14
TRUSS MANUFACTURING INC
NORTH BRANFORD, CT—2026-07-14
NYK STATEWIDE MOLINA CONSTRUCTION LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344429154.