1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

MENOMONEE FALLS, WI —

OSHA Inspection: WINCO STAMPING INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WINCO STAMPING INC. in W156 N9277 TIPP STREET, MENOMONEE FALLS, WI 53051 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 344468244.

Watch Winco Stamping INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Winco Stamping INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
WINCO STAMPING INC.
Site address
W156 N9277 TIPP STREET
City
MENOMONEE FALLS
State
WI
ZIP
53051
Mailing
W156 N9277 TIPP STREET, MENOMONEE FALLS, WI 53051

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
332116
Employees
47
Ownership type
A

Citations

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6747.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  (a) E.W. Bliss C150 Press: On or about November 22, 2019, the employer did not insure employees conducting die changes and adjustments of press die(s) were utilizing established machine specific lockout procedures, exposing employees to caught in, struck by, and crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6747

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9446.00 · Current $6000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employee(s) in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts and crushing hazards.    (a) Northwest- Fanuc Drill Mate; C-Model 10: On or about November 22, 2019, the employer did not ensure barrier guarding, interlock and/or light curtains were properly implemented as part of the integrated safety system. This allowed employee(s) to open the door that accesses the point of operation in an energized state, exposing the employee(s) to ingoing nip point, crushing hazard and amputation injury.    (b) Northcentral- Fanuc Drill Mate; C-Model 10: On or about November 22, 2019, the employer did not ensure barrier guarding, interlock and/or light curtains were properly implemented as part of the integrated safety system. This allowed employee(s) to open the door that accesses the point of operation in an energized state, exposing the employee(s) to ingoing nip point, crushing hazard and amputation injury.    (c) Northeast-Fanuc Drill Mate; C-Model 10: On or about November 22, 2019, the employer did not ensure barrier guarding, interlock and/or light curtains were properly implemented as part of the integrated safety system. This allowed employee(s) to open the door that accesses the point of operation in an energized state, exposing the employee(s) to ingoing nip point, crushing hazard and amputation injury.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $9446

1910.212 A03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  (a)  Cincinnati Shear: On or about November 22, 2019, employee(s) using the shear to cut sheet metal, exposed the operator to crushing hazard and amputation injury, in-that sufficient guarding was not in place to prevent the employees fingers, and hands from coming into contact with the shear blade point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.217 D09 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9446.00 · Current $6000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(iv): Safety blocks were not used when mechanical power press die(s) were being adjusted or repaired in the press.    (a) E.W.Bliss - C150 mechanical Press: On or about November 22, 2019, the employer did not insure employees conducting die changes and adjustments of press dies were using die safety blocks to protect employees from caught in and crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $9446

1910.217 D09 I

Deleted Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $18892.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(i): The employer did not establish a die setting procedure for mechanical power press(es) that would ensure compliance with 29 CFR 1910.217(c).  (a ) E.W. Bliss - C150 Mechanical Press: On or about November 22, 2019,  the employer did not establish and provide a die setting procedure to employees conducting die changes on the press, to insure any procedure being followed met the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section.  The Winco Stamping, Inc. company was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(i) , which was contained in OSHA inspection number #1341410, citation number 1, item number 5, and was affirmed as a final order on November 27, 2018, with respect to a workplace located at 650 Precision Court, Miamisburg, OH 45342.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $18892

More inspections at WINCO STAMPING INC.

View WINCO STAMPING INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332116)

More inspections in WI

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344468244.