OSHA Inspection: NYLO METAL FINISHING, LLC

Issued

2020-08-13 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-08-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $325.00 · Current $325.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Location: 730 North Main Street, Waterbury, CT 06704  Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 001a, Citation 01, Item 001b, Citation 02, Item 002a, Citation 02, 002b, Citation 01, Item 003, Citation 01, Item 004, Citation 01, Item 005a, Citation 01, Item 005b and Citation 02, Item 001 with a Final Order Date of July 9, 2020 was not received within 10 calendar days (by July 18, 2020) following the abatement due date (July 8, 2020).

Issued

2020-06-11 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2313.00 · Current $2313.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.22(a)(3): Walking-working surfaces were not maintained free of hazards such as sharp or protruding objects, loose boards, corrosion, leaks, spills, snow, and ice:   Facility: The walking-working surfaces in the warehouse and production area were not maintained in a dry condition.

Issued

2020-06-11 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.141(d)(1): Washing facilities were not maintained in a sanitary condition:  Facility: The restroom for the employees to use was not kept in a sanitary condition.

Issued

2020-06-11 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2892.00 · Current $2892.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures consisting of (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii), (c)(1)(iv), (c)(1)(v), 134(c)(1)(vi), (c)(1)(vii), (c)(1)(viii), and (c)(1)(ix) of this standard:  Facility: The employer did not establish and implement a worksite-specific written respiratory protection program and procedures consisting of employee training, proper selection, fit testing and medical evaluation where employees were required to wear N95 HDX respirator masks and/or 3M 7502 half facepiece tight fitting negative pressure respirators.

Issued

2020-06-11 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):     Facility: The employer did not ensure that the employees required to wear 3M 7502 half facepiece tight fitting negative pressure respirators and/or N95 HDX respirator masks were fit tested prior to initial wear of the respirator.

Issued

2020-06-11 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1):  The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):  Facility: The employer did not ensure through providing training and performing evaluation that the employees required to wear N95 HDX respirator masks and/or an 3M 7503 half facepiece tight fitting negative pressure respirators obtained minimum knowledge, skills and other items listed in section (i) through (vii) of this standard.

Issued

2020-06-11 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2892.00 · Current $2892.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:        Facility: The employees required to wear N95 HDX respirator masks and/or 3M 7502 half facepiece tight fitting negative pressure respirators were not medically evaluated to determine the employee's ability to wear a respirator prior to fit test or required to wear respirators.

Issued

2020-06-11 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2313.00 · Current $2313.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):      Facility: The employer did not ensure through providing training and performing evaluation that employees required to operate powered industrial trucks (PIT) were competent to operate the PITs safely at all times.

Issued

2020-06-11 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2313.00 · Current $2313.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training would be met, including the sections of (e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii) of this standard:  Facility: The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain a site-specific written Hazard Communication program where employees were required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Lab Oil 100, Ammonium Chloride, and Sodium Difluoride.

Issued

2020-06-11 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   Facility: The employees required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to)  Lab Oil 100, Ammonium Chloride, and Sodium Difluoride were not provided with information and training on the chemical hazard communications.

Issued

2020-06-11 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-07-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who was required by this section to use personal protective equipment (PPE), including (f)(1)(i), (f)(1)(ii), (f)(1)(iii), (f)(1)(iv) and (f)(1)(v) of this standard:   Facility: The employer did not provided training and information to the employees required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) on the Workplace Hazard Assessment for PPE.