Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CESAR GUAMAN ROOFING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CESAR GUAMAN ROOFING, LLC in 315 SCOTT ROAD, WATERBURY, CT 06705 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344599147.

Watch Cesar Guaman Roofing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cesar Guaman Roofing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
315 SCOTT ROAD
City
WATERBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06705
Mailing
109 ROBERT STREET, WATERBURY, CT 06710
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $325.00 · Current $325.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   Location: 315 Scott Road, Waterbury, Connecticut  Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1b with a final order date of 1/26/2020 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 3/19/2020) following the abatement due date (3/9/2020).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $325

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2892.00 · Current $2892.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to use pneumatic nail guns to install asphalt roofing shingles were provided with and required to wear eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2892

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2892.00 · Current $2892.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were working on the residential roof were protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2892

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on the roof at a height above 6 feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344599147.