Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: DERRIK BRADFIELD

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DERRIK BRADFIELD in 8647 W SLOAN ST, BOISE, ID 83714 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344715446.

Watch Derrik Bradfield — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Derrik Bradfield is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DERRIK BRADFIELD
Site address
8647 W SLOAN ST
City
BOISE
State
ID
ZIP
83714
Mailing
407 N MICHIGAN AVE, CALDWELL, ID 83605
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $2313.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a) On or about March 13, 2020 and at times prior thereto; operators of pneumatic nail guns were not wearing safety eyewear that protected them from impact injuries or flying wood particles.  Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2313.00 · Current $2313.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   a) On or about March 13, 2020, and at times prior thereto, a framer was installing sheathing on the front elevation of a single story new build without a fall protection system installed; exposing framer to falls ranging from 10-20 feet. Employer was unable to demonstrate effective use of a fall protection plan for employees working at heights ranging from 10-20 feet on a 6x12 roof in excess of 19 feet while using pneumatic nail guns to apply sheathing. Fall protection plan was not prepared; it did not identify each location where a fall protection method could not be used, document reasons why the use of a conventional fall protection system was infeasible, was not prepared by a competent person familiar with the fall protection standards.  Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344715446.