Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: BUTTERFIELD HEALTH CARE VIII LLC DBA MEADOWBROOK MANOR

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of BUTTERFIELD HEALTH CARE VIII LLC DBA MEADOWBROOK MANOR in 431 REMINGTON BLVD, BOLINGBROOK, IL 60440 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 344741913.

Watch Butterfield Health Care Viii LLC DBA Meadowbrook Manor — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Butterfield Health Care Viii LLC DBA Meadowbrook Manor is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
431 REMINGTON BLVD
City
BOLINGBROOK
State
IL
ZIP
60440
Mailing
431 REMINGTON BLVD, BOLINGBROOK, IL 60440
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
190
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12145.00 · Current $9000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a)  On or about May 6, 2020, where the use of respiratory protection including, but not limited to, a N95 respirator was required for employees working in the COVID-19 resident areas, the employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program was established and implemented.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $9000
  • — C (S) $12145
  • — Z (S) $12145

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee�s ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a)  On or about May 6, 2020, in the COVID-19 resident areas, employees were required to wear N95 respirators when working with residents suspected or confirmed as having COVID-19.  The employer did not provide these employees with a medical evaluation to ensure the employees were capable of safely wearing a respirator such as a N95.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    a)  On or about May 6, 2020, in the COVID-19 resident areas, employees were required to wear N95 respirators when working with residents suspected or confirmed as having COVID-19.  The employer failed to provide these employees with an initial fit.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344741913.