Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PLEXI CHEMIE, INC.

Monitoring inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a monitoring safety inspection of PLEXI CHEMIE, INC. in 606-6 LANE AVENUE SOUTH, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32254 (NAICS 238330). OSHA activity number 344792668.

Watch Plexi Chemie, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Plexi Chemie, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PLEXI CHEMIE, INC.
Site address
606-6 LANE AVENUE SOUTH
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32254
Mailing
606-6 LANE AVENUE NORTH, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32254
Inspection type
Monitoring (D)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238330
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3856.00 · Current $3856.00
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   a. On or about June 17, 2020, the employer required employees to wear NIOSH approved, 3M Brand, tight fitting half face and, or, N95 filtering facepiece dustmask respirators when grinding, mixing solvent-based coatings, and while applying the coatings and the employer did not implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluations, fit testing, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3856

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a. On or about June 17, 2020, the employer required employees to wear NIOSH approved, 3M Brand, tight fitting half face and, or, N95 filtering facepiece dustmask respirators when grinding, mixing solvent-based coatings, and while applying the coatings and had not been provided  the employees with medical evaluations prior to wearing the respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   a. On or about June 17, 2020, the employer required employees to wear NIOSH approved, 3M Brand, tight fitting half face and, or, N95 filtering facepiece dustmask respirators when grinding, mixing solvent-based coatings, and while applying the coatings and had not been fit tested prior to initial use of the respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  a. On or about June 17, 2020, the employer required employees to wear NIOSH approved, 3M Brand, tight fitting half face and, or, N95 filtering facepiece dustmask respirators when grinding, mixing solvent-based coatings, and while applying the coatings, as these employees had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the respirator facepiece and the face.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  a. On or about June 17, 2020, the employer required employees to wear NIOSH approved, 3M Brand, tight fitting half face and, or, N95 filtering facepiece dustmask respirators when grinding, mixing solvent-based coatings, and while applying the coatings, without first receiving respirator training that met all of the requirements of these standard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet:    a. On or about June 17, 2020, the employer had not developed a written Hazard Communication Program that included a list of the hazardous chemicals known to present in the workplace such as, but not limited to: Rubber thane, Plexi concrete hardners, epoxy resins, nature stones, Setathane, Mondur 582, Tera cure N32, and Versa Cure.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344792668.