ALLENTOWN, PA —
OSHA Inspection: K. HEEPS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of K. HEEPS, INC. in 5239 TILGHMAN ST., ALLENTOWN, PA 18104 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 344954276.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- K. HEEPS, INC.
- Site address
- 5239 TILGHMAN ST.
- City
- ALLENTOWN
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18104
- Mailing
- 5239 TILGHMAN ST., ALLENTOWN, PA 18104
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311612
- Employees
- 32
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $8096.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment. a) K. Heeps - On or about October 2, 2020, employees use various chemicals to include but not limited to a foaming alkaline cleaner to perform cleaning of meat processing equipment and the employer has not assessed the workplace to determine if hazards were present necessitating personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $8096
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a) K. Heeps - On or about October 2, 2020, employees use various chemicals to include but not limited to a foaming alkaline cleaner to perform cleaning of meat processing equipment and the employer did not ensure each affected employee used eye and face protection as described in the cleaner's Safety Data Sheet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a):The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes. a) K. Heeps - On or about October 2, 2020, employees use various chemicals to include but not limited to a foaming alkaline cleaner to perform cleaning of meat processing equipment and the employer has not provided employees with hand protection necessitated by the cleaner's Safety Data Sheet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $9446.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative. a) K. Heeps, Inc., production floor, meat grinding room - On or about October 2, 2020, employees performing servicing and maintenance activities to include, but not limited to cleaning the internal parts of meat processing equipment such as meat grinders and meat flakers without first de-energizing or isolating the energy sources. The employer had not established a lockout-tagout program, employee training or conducted periodic inspections.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $9446
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $9446.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. a) K. Heeps, Production Floor, Meat Grinding Room - Employees place semi-frozen blocks of meat into a grinder with the guard removed, exposing employees to the rotating blade/paddle.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $9446
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5398.00 · Current $4000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. a) K. Heeps, Meat Grinding Room - On or about October 2, 2020, employees use various chemicals to include but not limited to a foaming alkaline cleaner to perform cleaning of meat processing equipment and the employer has not developed a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $5398
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area. a) K. Heeps - On or about October 2, 2020, employees use various chemicals to include but not limited to a foaming alkaline cleaner to perform cleaning of meat processing equipment and the employer has not developed a written hazard communication training program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1350.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): Employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A form or equivalent. a) K. Heeps - On or about October 2, 2020, The employer did not maintain the OSHA 300 logs for calendar years 2016, 2018, 2019 and 2020.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (O) $1350
More inspections at K. HEEPS, INC.
ALLENTOWN, PA—2007-01-05 00:00:00
K. HEEPS, INC.
ALLENTOWN, PA—2005-07-22 00:00:00
K. HEEPS, INC.
View K. HEEPS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311612)
MARTINSVILLE, VA—2026-07-07
MONOGRAM SNACKS MARTINSVILLE, LLC
DIXON, CA—2026-07-07
SUPERIOR FARMS
LINDEN, NJ—2026-07-07
PULASKI MEAT PRODUCTS CO, INC.
LINCOLN, NE—2026-07-01
SMITHFIELD PACKAGED MEATS CORP.
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-06-30
NUEVO GARCIA FOODS LLC
More inspections in PA
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
JEFFERSON HILLS, PA—2026-07-16
MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY ASPHALT TERMINAL
SMITHFIELD, PA—2026-07-16
CARLISLE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
PITTSBURGH, PA—2026-07-15
DREAM GREENER LAWN & LANDSCAPE
COCHRANTON, PA—2026-07-15
CRAWFORD COUNTY HARDWOODS, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344954276.