OSHA Inspection: JOAQUIN SAVALA

Issued

2021-01-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2021-02-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2341.00 · Current $2341.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   At the residential worksite located at 1400 Blue Branch Drive, Grain Valley, Missouri:  Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to injury/illness from dermal, ingestion, and inhalation hazards from exposure to hazardous chemicals.  The employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program to ensure that employees were aware of the hazards associated with the chemicals with which they work.  Hazardous chemicals used at the site included but were not limited to gasoline.

Issued

2021-01-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2021-02-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3511.00 · Current $3511.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.  At the residential worksite located at 1400 Blue Branch Drive, Grain Valley, Missouri:  Employees engaged in roofing activities while using pneumatic nail guns were not protected from flying particles by using eye or face protection.

Issued

2021-01-26 00:00:00

Abate by

2021-02-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   At the residential worksite located at 1400 Blue Branch Drive, Grain Valley, Missouri:  Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards greater than 7.9 feet from the lowest point of the roof to the ground while not utilizing fall protection systems.