Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HUGO SALAZAR HERNANDEZ

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of HUGO SALAZAR HERNANDEZ in 3225 AUSTIN PARKWAY, SUGAR LAND, TX 77479 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345019848.

Watch Hugo Salazar Hernandez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hugo Salazar Hernandez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3225 AUSTIN PARKWAY
City
SUGAR LAND
State
TX
ZIP
77479
Mailing
1305 LINCOLN STREET, BRYAN, TX 77808
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(4)(i):Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights) more than 6 feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around the opening.   a)  On or about November 11, 2020, located on the east side of the school, employees were exposed to fall hazard greater than 6 feet when performing roofing tasks without protecting a roof opening with a cover, guardrail system or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4096
  • — C (S) $4096
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(10):Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:  a)  On or about November 11, 2020, located at the jobsite, employees performing roofing work were exposed to fall hazard greater than 6 feet when using a warning line system without a combination of different fall protection systems.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4096
  • — C (S) $4096
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.502 F01 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(f)(1)(ii):  When mechanical equipment was being used, the warning line was not erected at least 6 feet (1.8 m) from the roof edge which is parallel to the direction of mechanical equipment operation, and at least 10 feet (3.1 m) from the roof edge which is perpendicular to the direction of mechanical equipment operation.  a)  On or about November 11, 2020, located on the east side of the school, employees performing roofing tasks were exposed to fall hazard greater than 6 feet when the warning line system did not extend to the wall.  b) On or about November 11, 2020, located on the east side of the school, employees performing roofing tasks were exposed to fall hazard greater than 6 feet when the warning line system was not set-up at the proper distances.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4096
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3511.00 · Current $3511.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a)  On or about November 11, 2020, at the jobsite, a training program to identify and minimize fall hazards was not provided to employees performing roofing tasks.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3511
  • — C (S) $3511
  • — Z (S) $3511

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345019848.