OSHA Inspection: JUNG KIM DBA JUNG KIM

Issued

2021-08-31 00:00:00

Abate by

2021-10-19 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $329.00 · Current $329.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a.  On or about August 31, 2021, the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected.  Citation Number          Item Number           Abatement Date 01                                        001a                             03/30/2021 01                                        001b                             03/30/2021

Issued

2021-02-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2021-03-30 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  a. On or about November 18, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not maintain an accident prevention program to comply with the regulations of this part which included, but were not limited to employee protection when exposed to hazards related to residential construction.

Issued

2021-02-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2021-03-30 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a.  On or about November 18, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, employees conducting roofing operations were not provided training on how to recognize and minimize fall hazards, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.

Issued

2021-02-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.   a. On or about November 18, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee using a pneumatic nail gun did not wear safety glasses, thereby exposing the employee to the hazards associated with eye injuries.

Issued

2021-02-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a. On or about November 18, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, nine (9) feet  four (4) inches  feet above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.  b. On or about November 18, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing residential roofing operations, eight (8) feet  eight (8) inches above the ground, was not protected from falls, thereby exposing an employee to fall hazards.

Issued

2021-02-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1755.00 · Current $1755.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(4):Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  a.  On or about November 18, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was using an A-Frame fiberglass ladder for access and egress,  which was leaned against the side of the building, thereby exposing the employee to the hazards associated with falls of eight (8) feet eight (8) inches above the ground.