Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MAX ROOFING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAX ROOFING, LLC in 2544 OBSERVATORY, CINCINNATI, OH 45208 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345037477.

Watch MAX Roofing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MAX Roofing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MAX ROOFING, LLC
Site address
2544 OBSERVATORY
City
CINCINNATI
State
OH
ZIP
45208
Mailing
8860 PRIMROSE, LOVELAND, OH 45140
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  a.)  On or about November 24, 2020, the employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment being used thus exposing employees to a 24 foot 7 inch fall hazard located on a residential roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a.) On or about November 24, 2020, employees were exposed to a 24 foot 7 inch fall hazard while performing re-roofing work on a residential roof top and not using any means of conventional fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.502 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(a)(2):Employers shall provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for an employee, and shall comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before that employee begins the work that necessitates the fall protection.  a.) On or about November 24, 2020, the employer failed to install all fall protection systems before employees began working on a 24 foot 7 inch high single family residential roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  a.) On or about November 24, 2020, employees were exposed to fall hazards when performing roofing activities on a low-sloped residential roof and were not adequately trained to recognize the hazards associated with not using a complete fall protection system.  Employees were exposed to a 24 foot 7 inch fall hazard from the roof while not using any form of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4096

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345037477.