2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: PRO INSULATOR

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of PRO INSULATOR in 1017 E 11TH ST., TULSA, OK 74128 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 345128912.

Watch PRO Insulator — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for PRO Insulator is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PRO INSULATOR
Site address
1017 E 11TH ST.
City
TULSA
State
OK
ZIP
74128
Mailing
10338 E 11TH ST., TULSA, OK 74120
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2341.00 · Current $1405.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   On or about February 02, 2021, and at times prior to, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program. Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to,  Bis (2-Dimethylaminoethyl) ether, Polymethylene polyphenyl isocyanate, 4,4-Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1404.6
  • — Z (S) $2341

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2341.00 · Current $1405.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about February 02, 2021, and at times prior there to, a written respiratory protection program was not established or implemented. Employees are required to wear full face air purifying or loose fitting supplied air respirators when performing spray foam application.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1404.6
  • — Z (S) $2341

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about February 02, 2021, and at times prior there to, the employer required the use of a full face elastomeric respirator and did not provide a medical evaluation to the employee prior to the use, exposing the employee to respiratory hazards including, but not limited to, Bis (2-Dimethylaminoethyl) ether,  Polymethylene polyphenyl isocyanate, 4,4-Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about February 02, 2021, and at times prior there to, the employer did not ensure each employee had been fit tested before using a tight fitting full face respirator.  Employees were exposed to inhalation hazards to exposure from chemicals including, but not limited to, Bis (2-Dimethylaminoethyl) ether, Polymethylene polyphenyl isocyanate, 4,4-Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345128912.