Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CARLOS PINEDA DBA ARCO IRIS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CARLOS PINEDA DBA ARCO IRIS in 323 S. WEST AVE, ELMHURST, IL 60126 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 345130124.

Watch Carlos Pineda DBA Arco Iris — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Carlos Pineda DBA Arco Iris is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
323 S. WEST AVE
City
ELMHURST
State
IL
ZIP
60126
Mailing
2340 N. MACARTHUR BLVD #1016, IRVING, TX 75062
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $329.00 · Current $329.00
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  Carlos Pineda dba Arco Iris. failed to submit documents to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date verifying  that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:  Citation Number                      Item  Number                 Abatement Date               01                                                    02                                     3/18/2021   Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $329

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated 1926.502(e).  On or about February 3, 2021, employees were performing construction activities outside a residential property using a JLG 450 AJ aerial lift and were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22 feet when the employer failed to ensure that fall protection was utilized.     No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area.  On or about February 3, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees were trained to recognize and minimize hazards associated with falls while operating aerial lifts.  Two employees using a JLG 450 AJ aerial lift were  exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22 feet while performing construction activities without utilizing fall protection.     Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345130124.