Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JUAN PERCIDA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN PERCIDA in 6245 MISTOVER LANE, CANAL WINCHESTER, OH 43110 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345192728.

Watch Juan Percida — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Percida is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JUAN PERCIDA
Site address
6245 MISTOVER LANE
City
CANAL WINCHESTER
State
OH
ZIP
43110
Mailing
1798 NORTHRIDGE ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43224
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. Located at 6245 Mistover Lane in Canal Winchester, Ohio: On or about March 12, 2021, the employer did not develop and maintain a safety and health program to ensure hazards were identified and corrected onsite while employees performed roofing work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. Located at 6245 Mistover Lane in Canal Winchester, Ohio: On or about March 12, 2021, the employer did not provide training for employees on the recognition and control of hazards while performing framing work onsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2341.00 · Current $2341.00
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.  a. Located at 6245 Mistover Lane in Canal Winchester, Ohio: On or about March 12, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees working below the roof edges where an existing roof was being removed above were protected from falling tools and debris, thereby exposing employees to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4096.00 · Current $4096.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure.  a. Located at 6245 Mistover Lane in Canal Winchester, Ohio: On or about March 12, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees performing roofing work were protected from falling from the roof. Employees were exposed to fall hazards ten to twenty foot to the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d):"Personal fall arrest systems." Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.  a. Located at 6245 Mistover Lane in Canal Winchester, Ohio: On or about March 12, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees performing roofing work were protected from falling from the roof due to the use of unapproved climbing harnesses. The equipment was not designed and approved for use as a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345192728.