2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: TRI STAR AUTO PARTS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TRI STAR AUTO PARTS, INC. in 320 10TH AVENUE, BALDWIN, WI 54002 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 345252381.

Watch TRI Star Auto Parts, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TRI Star Auto Parts, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
320 10TH AVENUE
City
BALDWIN
State
WI
ZIP
54002
Mailing
P.O. BOX 96, BALDWIN, WI 54002
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
115
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5969.00 · Current $3581.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  (a) East warehouse, forklift battery charging area; The employer did not provide and/or require an employee to use appropriate eye or face protection while adding water to the cells of an acid battery located on the Caterpillar model ET3000-AC forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3581.4
  • — Z (S) $5969

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  (a) East warehouse, forklift battery charging area; Adequate facilities for quick drenching and flushing of the eyes and body were not provided for employees who add water to the cells of an acid battery located on the Caterpillar model ET3000-AC forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7461.00 · Current $4477.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:  (a) Disassembly Department; Employees were using compressed air blow guns to clean debris from surfaces of engine components without pressure reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4476.6
  • — Z (S) $7461

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4476.00 · Current $2686.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:  (a) Machining and Assembly Departments; Labels to communicate physical and/or health hazards to employees were not affixed to workplace containers that contained hazardous chemicals including penetrating oil and alkyd paints.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2685.6
  • — Z (S) $4476

1910.134 L01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(l)(1): Evaluations of the workplace were not conducted to ensure the written respiratory protection program was being effectively implemented:  (a) Block and Assembly Departments; The employer did not conduct an evaluation to ensure that employees engaged in spray finishing operations were not exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  (a) Finished Goods Department; An employee operating a Raymond Type E model 445-C30TT counterbalanced forklift had not received a powered industrial truck operator performance evaluation since May of 2017, surpassing the minimum triannual requirement by approximately 11 months.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345252381.