Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: NUTEX INDUSTRIES, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of NUTEX INDUSTRIES, INC. in 127 W RODNEY FRENCH BLVD, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02744 (NAICS 313210). OSHA activity number 345267504.

Watch Nutex Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nutex Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
127 W RODNEY FRENCH BLVD
City
NEW BEDFORD
State
MA
ZIP
02744
Mailing
127 W RODNEY FRENCH BLVD, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02744
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
313210
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2653.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(a)(4): Safeguard(s) designed to protect employees during an emergency (e.g., sprinkler systems, alarm systems, fire doors, exit lighting), were not in proper working order at all times:   Establishment:  The following exit doors were not maintained in good repair. The exit doors were rusting, and did not properly aligned in the door frames  and did not open freely. a)	Exit Door #27 at the Receiving Dock. b)	Exit Door at the Shipping Dock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2653

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1989.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":   The following exit doors were not marked as or equipped with a sign reading "Exit": a)	Exit door #27 at the Receiving Dock. b)	Exit door at the Shipping Dock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1989

1910.37 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent:  Establishment:  On the first floor from the back area of the Master Braid Room, the direction of travel was not marked or readily apparent.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.37 E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2653.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(e): Employer did not install and maintain an operable employee alarm system that had a distinctive signal to warn employees of fire or other emergencies:  Establishment:  Employee alarm system is not capable of being perceived throughout all areas of the plant such as the Wardwell Room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2653

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3316.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): Employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  Production Area:  Employer did not develop and implement a Hearing Conservation Program as required by this section for employees who were engaging in operating braiding machines and were exposed to noise in excess of the OSHA action level (AL) of 85 decibels.  Two employees who were sampled for 401 and 313 minutes were exposed to noise at 87.4 and 87.1 decibels (dBA) equivalent 8-hour time weighted average, respectively.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3316

1910.38 C06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.38(c)(6): Employer's emergency action plan (EAP) did not include the name or job title of every employee who may be contacted by employees who need more information about the plan or an explanation of their duties under the plan:  Establishment:  Employer's EAP had not been revised to reflect changes such as the name of the employees who were available to be contacted for more info about the employer's EAP and the employee alarm system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View NUTEX INDUSTRIES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345267504.