Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: KAO WAREHOUSE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KAO WAREHOUSE, INC. in 600 HARTMAN INDUSTRIAL CT, AUSTELL, GA 30168 (NAICS 423110). OSHA activity number 345277412.

Watch KAO Warehouse, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for KAO Warehouse, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KAO WAREHOUSE, INC.
Site address
600 HARTMAN INDUSTRIAL CT
City
AUSTELL
State
GA
ZIP
30168
Mailing
600 HARTMAN INDUSTRIAL CT, AUSTELL, GA 30168
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423110
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6632.00 · Current $3979.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees from being struck-by material and falling rack components.   a. Warehouse Area, rack location A01: On or about April 28, 2021, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees walking and operating powered industrial vehicles in the warehouse area to struck-by hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that the steel storage rack labeled A01 having bent/damaged braces, and missing bracing components was isolated until the damage was evaluated by a storage rack design professional and was not placed into service until repaired.  b. Warehouse Area, rack location A02: On or about April 28, 2021, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees walking and operating powered industrial vehicles in the warehouse area to struck-by hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that the steel storage rack labeled A02 having missing bracing components was isolated until the damage was evaluated by a storage rack design professional and was not placed into service until repaired.  c. Warehouse Area, rack location A04: On or about April 28, 2021, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees walking and operating powered industrial vehicles in the warehouse area to struck-by hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that the steel storage rack labeled A04 having bent/damaged supports was isolated until the damage was evaluated by a storage rack design professional and was not placed into service until repaired.  d. Warehouse Area, rack location E23: On or about April 28, 2021, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees walking and operating powered industrial vehicles in the warehouse area to struck-by hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that the steel storage rack labeled E23 having bent/damaged supports was isolated until the damage was evaluated by a storage rack design professional and was not placed into service until repaired.  e. Warehouse Area, rack location E25: On or about April 28, 2021, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees walking and operating powered industrial vehicles in the warehouse area to struck-by hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that the steel storage rack labeled E25 having bent/damaged supports was isolated until the damage was evaluated by a storage rack design professional and was not placed into service until repaired.  f. Warehouse Area, rack location E28: On or about April 28, 2021, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees walking and operating powered industrial vehicles in the warehouse area to struck-by hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that the steel storage rack labeled E28 having bent/damaged supports was isolated until the damage was evaluated by a storage rack design professional and was not placed into service until repaired.  g. Warehouse Area, rack location - 4 foot: On or about April 28, 2021, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees walking and operating powered industrial vehicles in the warehouse area to struck-by hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that the steel storage rack labeled 4 foot and 5 foot having bent/damaged supports was isolated until the damage was evaluated by a storage rack design professional and was not placed into service until repaired.  h. Warehouse Area, rack location - 5 foot: On or about April 28, 2021, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees walking and operating powered industrial vehicles in the warehouse area to struck-by hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that the steel storage rack labeled 4 foot and 5 foot having  missing bracing components was isolated until the damage was evaluated by a storage rack design professional and was not placed into service until repaired.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3979.2
  • — Z (S) $6632

COPART

COPART

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345277412.